Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 10:53:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 10:53:37 -0500 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com ([207.175.42.156]:10758 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 10:53:20 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 10:53:19 -0500 From: Crutcher Dunnavant To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] SysRQ Registration Patch v: 0.10 Message-ID: <20001103105319.A21856@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Department: OS Development Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Anyone interested in advanced debuging features: I've reved the SysRQ Registration Patch, available at: http://bama.ua.edu/~dunna001/sysrq-register/ The latest is 0.10, and applies to 2.2.18-pre9, 2.4.0-test10-pre6, and 2.4.0-test10-pre7. I got tired of reving the patch accross 6 versions, so I am going to do all future revs against the latest 2.2 and 2.4. I've changed some symbol names to be shorter/saner, cleaned up some formating, and made some trivial efficieny tweaks that the compiler *should* do on its own, anyway, but what the hell. I also played with the example modules a bit, and fixed an SMP problem one of them had. I really think that this would make a good addition to the kernel, and it touches a relatively small amount of code. Please examine this, and tell me what you think. -- "I may be a monkey, Crutcher Dunnavant but I'm a monkey with ambition!" Red Hat OS Development - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/