Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp4461452imm; Wed, 30 May 2018 06:10:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLt9brTSgBUK4svq0ctp3qIGsdiAVaWdaNov7Qvh2Gb84OqMAWKiYEyAz6R9/OiEhOwsDZm X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7898:: with SMTP id q24-v6mr2874855pll.254.1527685854445; Wed, 30 May 2018 06:10:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527685854; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HKPXi4HzsyDddjYt7OmnBanGQr+/i8B/DXkF0PF6QCIrlKhQKtusNJa7bwqJYCi6FS D6qdDcQRYiyFIxs6LqsH5sDfgaieckCpd/BiSap7Roafz2t+fURHFp9qGYr3gruvRd7x bHfm/wKE66OnE/9FIt/zKomaTShvQrp+9JZVCDvSDvEaLHNsblXK99eEYg85bk+1u7pi XsVBIVIB7s298nIWYoBFCqpdkWUUOX58A91LamkSPwbokJ5APQ7DpBdTpHhJjIv9t7ts lQhn7E7e6BQ+GQcBOobpLvcroY5uSkPxZzSsh/vsxiN3ms7bvzCbjLcod2/6O+P3DWED ir+g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=bzjULET8EDVrSigobdUNbfqHIRZxRev4yTWorgHnEwU=; b=jZzbnwdRGnlxDRe6l+eXxjTzhjTEC5I9WDHJJKjS/ebJNSMjej8cogZGV9QvRT/Kfd AECFfSAYBxi7bZhkVieQceFwiYcWJsrlf4F3+aa2HT/Z9vJt0goIvmP4lft+q14AVybe ZKAWVxwEm8FtI5UlY7TV04XTFlO5G26n5HmrLOWvFpdkWoEhPdLs4lEi+RI9SXuG6usl +m1vy08TbRmKenYlwKT3CWKNQRmWlxWgotfsxyq4TldgAx28gxKHOVNDJIoTrw3V1sje SKYAcEkxLu7w5RqpZzamHtOgaYmkYw8VwAv6Zby2H0QS/mHZTKrf+Ddu+25XVwYbDZTV /QnQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l189-v6si13059124pfc.365.2018.05.30.06.10.27; Wed, 30 May 2018 06:10:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753266AbeE3NIz (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 30 May 2018 09:08:55 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:36690 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752102AbeE3NIx (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2018 09:08:53 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w4UD7TFs012193 for ; Wed, 30 May 2018 09:08:53 -0400 Received: from e17.ny.us.ibm.com (e17.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.207]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2j9ve18m5c-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 30 May 2018 09:08:52 -0400 Received: from localhost by e17.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 30 May 2018 09:08:51 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.23) by e17.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.204) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 30 May 2018 09:08:48 -0400 Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.110]) by b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w4UD8lMC2031938 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 30 May 2018 13:08:47 GMT Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7DFAE062; Wed, 30 May 2018 09:09:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DE2AE060; Wed, 30 May 2018 09:09:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sbct-3.pok.ibm.com (unknown [9.47.158.153]) by b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 May 2018 09:09:12 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] ima: Differentiate auditing policy rules from "audit" actions To: Richard Guy Briggs Cc: zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sgrubb@redhat.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180524201105.3179904-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180524201105.3179904-9-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180530124920.g5agxm75x4i6pw6n@madcap2.tricolour.ca> From: Stefan Berger Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 09:08:47 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180530124920.g5agxm75x4i6pw6n@madcap2.tricolour.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-MW X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18053013-0040-0000-0000-00000436D03A X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009098; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000264; SDB=6.01039828; UDB=6.00530820; IPR=6.00818962; MB=3.00021375; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-05-30 13:08:50 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18053013-0041-0000-0000-0000083CF5EC Message-Id: <35894dae-c9c6-aa65-da99-c0283d459878@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-05-30_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1805220000 definitions=main-1805300148 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/30/2018 08:49 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 2018-05-24 16:11, Stefan Berger wrote: >> The AUDIT_INTEGRITY_RULE is used for auditing IMA policy rules and >> the IMA "audit" policy action. This patch defines >> AUDIT_INTEGRITY_POLICY_RULE to reflect the IMA policy rules. >> >> With this change we now call integrity_audit_msg_common() to get >> common integrity auditing fields. This now produces the following >> record when parsing an IMA policy rule: >> >> type=UNKNOWN[1806] msg=audit(1527004216.690:311): action=dont_measure \ >> fsmagic=0x9fa0 pid=1613 uid=0 auid=0 ses=2 \ >> subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 \ >> op=policy_update cause=parse_rule comm="echo" exe="/usr/bin/echo" \ >> tty=tty2 res=1 >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger >> --- >> include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 3 ++- >> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 5 +++-- >> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h >> index 4e61a9e05132..776e0abd35cf 100644 >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h >> @@ -146,7 +146,8 @@ >> #define AUDIT_INTEGRITY_STATUS 1802 /* Integrity enable status */ >> #define AUDIT_INTEGRITY_HASH 1803 /* Integrity HASH type */ >> #define AUDIT_INTEGRITY_PCR 1804 /* PCR invalidation msgs */ >> -#define AUDIT_INTEGRITY_RULE 1805 /* policy rule */ >> +#define AUDIT_INTEGRITY_RULE 1805 /* IMA "audit" action policy msgs */ >> +#define AUDIT_INTEGRITY_POLICY_RULE 1806 /* IMA policy rules */ >> >> #define AUDIT_KERNEL 2000 /* Asynchronous audit record. NOT A REQUEST. */ >> >> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c >> index 3aed25a7178a..a8ae47a386b4 100644 >> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c >> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c >> @@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) >> int result = 0; >> >> ab = integrity_audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, >> - AUDIT_INTEGRITY_RULE); >> + AUDIT_INTEGRITY_POLICY_RULE); > Is it possible to connect this record to a syscall by replacing the > first parameter (NULL) by current->context? We would have to fix current->context in this case since it is NULL. We get to this location by root cat'ing a policy or writing a policy filename into /sys/kernel/security/ima/policy. > >> entry->uid = INVALID_UID; >> entry->fowner = INVALID_UID; >> @@ -926,7 +926,8 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) >> temp_ima_appraise |= IMA_APPRAISE_FIRMWARE; >> else if (entry->func == POLICY_CHECK) >> temp_ima_appraise |= IMA_APPRAISE_POLICY; >> - audit_log_format(ab, "res=%d", !result); >> + integrity_audit_msg_common(ab, NULL, NULL, >> + "policy_update", "parse_rule", result); >> audit_log_end(ab); >> return result; >> } > - RGB > > -- > Richard Guy Briggs > Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems > Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada > IRC: rgb, SunRaycer > Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635 >