Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp4713947imm; Wed, 30 May 2018 10:29:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKrshP9lkiTtxgjMx8HXiiy4ZfqU86qWom2IutMppj7soLk258f9OJNJgkJlUhP+bAT07cD X-Received: by 2002:a65:6205:: with SMTP id d5-v6mr2917162pgv.416.1527701351385; Wed, 30 May 2018 10:29:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527701351; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qe6p2Mu/PCIM84Y1nLWrdn1g2XN8MzWlcoB+JXTwWCtCGiwNT+ioyIchZKPK6UZnHB RUgW+Zh6/CUnyRmHroYt11v25QL3t9+SvGOvJqSIcSnat4vZt/9s32IHJI/cJcKW0Ki9 PSJDoBXmITAKx4Yrs6P9OCgL3SYpK/RakNiUoOCSncTRxV/SX9QwFD2H7BTgQF5dCK85 mhNmVbFLk2OwE8/1IjaoiifhkJMzjZLQey3L5M2cqr8Qlv4uNTzc7+NwEs+xmYWvCUUr m8YhvVCNNBt2lbNDNwvN21kdPls3RVItdZVfCvU3s8zElPxgM8VOoRcM2hOgQHP14EgM GyIg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=2AEvKsKC19rNufv360tdOGSTJ3GH+0czp8sYL9jVZNQ=; b=orW5tYR60t0WnsL7yySMDAYyNF9mxbni0x3hMKY04/8HUpFPuDGHqtJSo9bn0z9LDB GdtzmqigOgklA8yTqsaURGMuO4ZD1uuboAR9vsrPQitirgxdfbqk8g28l/2VWJxLmbac 8d8OuhGuzbGwL3nLp86cI90YQg56XulMtgRYB+zb8f/radMZ5op6jCa28Mtd5DGeCTC5 rwiDeZo3RJ2g6XnAtIuoLU6Evbbv5S9eD04kBOsU9V95EIOr1MnC4WCZl2tVErwhhnJy PtVhRGcuJFHuYAvkctkmuqjAAaS384h5nkVcWu0tSsyerZOw9KwbswXNmsBM/YectMSN NEmA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@broadcom.com header.s=google header.b=JEUpw+i5; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=broadcom.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c10-v6si27483888pgv.446.2018.05.30.10.28.57; Wed, 30 May 2018 10:29:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@broadcom.com header.s=google header.b=JEUpw+i5; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=broadcom.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753790AbeE3R1Y (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 30 May 2018 13:27:24 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:55065 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753653AbeE3R1T (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2018 13:27:19 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id f6-v6so49254332wmc.4 for ; Wed, 30 May 2018 10:27:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2AEvKsKC19rNufv360tdOGSTJ3GH+0czp8sYL9jVZNQ=; b=JEUpw+i5FqtsT70J2Y9rOhyW6Yje09PDqkp8tG3kAnVawp+e5Q0fxeeCo/Kw+2+Mm0 fDYld8D2Od5oy8miPs/QXZyZabxvYqax91NnBsreBliGOqhEpOSLDxZQ9Pc2Xdksn8E2 2voHr9uvwKiqmhP8hNzik8+FpIcqZbaSm2eDQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2AEvKsKC19rNufv360tdOGSTJ3GH+0czp8sYL9jVZNQ=; b=PtiE1HXYsl1mBnwLdBzWCDuJHkT7/PtUhI22Kyn3nt45YHJSioxeqIDC/xNEw+7Lz/ GdimG7T54KHDQ8eGRSDP9aPqfsIZsZ94sKkVc7by8LNvMKfRdhZPhx6sYeTw96WhBbmb Zee/bMA3/wzjkLdFIvDIMtreIv/4zT3BmylSXJMA8UCyYjR/iYflwhCnv/SJOgmAr0mG R75MLKohHckG5xHQTH6wi9EJbkj+aiukhXrszl1Sny73yI2CaG19HruJlglYo4iQv9hF kCeBzCYnvzizoU748Y++1ZIGZYoMKJIx7xvR4ul7SmzZmvRYREMWtHcTISs9FZ72sgBq a25Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwelsRNHZC3hu/RLzS5HTiByxxi1zydzzxE3L4+z7exPmDyz6SuW yJsW55bpyjifEGVgjdb2ky3dcQ== X-Received: by 2002:a50:cfca:: with SMTP id i10-v6mr4500199edk.35.1527701237492; Wed, 30 May 2018 10:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.136.8.248] ([192.19.228.250]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v37-v6sm5342457edm.0.2018.05.30.10.27.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 May 2018 10:27:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] PCI: iproc: Add INTx support with better modeling To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Linux Kernel Mailing List , bcm-kernel-feedback-list , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree , linux-arm Mailing List References: <1527631130-20045-1-git-send-email-ray.jui@broadcom.com> <1527631130-20045-3-git-send-email-ray.jui@broadcom.com> From: Ray Jui Message-ID: <9f4aedd8-17e0-3747-3bdb-2f2dc0a20756@broadcom.com> Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 10:27:12 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andy, On 5/29/2018 5:59 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 12:58 AM, Ray Jui wrote: >> Add PCIe legacy interrupt INTx support to the iProc PCIe driver by >> modeling it with its own IRQ domain. All 4 interrupts INTA, INTB, INTC, >> INTD share the same interrupt line connected to the GIC in the system, >> while the status of each INTx can be obtained through the INTX CSR >> register > >> + while ((status = iproc_pcie_read_reg(pcie, IPROC_PCIE_INTX_CSR) & >> + SYS_RC_INTX_MASK) != 0) { >> + for_each_set_bit(bit, &status, PCI_NUM_INTX) { >> + virq = irq_find_mapping(pcie->irq_domain, bit + 1); >> + if (virq) >> + generic_handle_irq(virq); >> + else >> + dev_err(dev, "unexpected INTx%u\n", bit); >> + } >> + } > > do { > status = ...; > for_each_set_bit() { > ... > } > } while (status); > > would look slightly better for my opinion. > Indeed. I agree with you. I'll wait for comments before sending out v2 which will include this improvement. Thanks, Ray