Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp289741imm; Wed, 30 May 2018 23:54:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKorTnXzLn6dAWlG6rf+jT8owOF3JNyoRsJ/eg1mAZEAJaQBiTP/ovyjYfKXhBGOslKwZR5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:780a:: with SMTP id p10-v6mr5845646pll.281.1527749694558; Wed, 30 May 2018 23:54:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527749694; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=T74/GJczMmVgtZ1lSAINGbC62s2KdOzrEjrO3SpHOkl3TracNaCCV4mKPRYzv6KY7j 252dkYJRKWXiaRTAX0JEN3q2TLD8g/TG20Inb80DTruVGDr9MZMJ7jAB8iwaKkE0Cudr pZSzTvz61IsZ0NXhFYAW2ILVRkmkMWvhk+NmvSFjZSBuUauhFC9+MMrgY6wOuVUiI4ea LJwc7uTmGDUKiQI7Iw0M81Uvagec135S4DLxiYCMgJ9uiDdFEvB9L1RcRaBEn9deBdG9 EFPSvSJanCYy7WSAj+CCt9yjOPCHNnrTr10E48KOGom0aeyS8EFJ2vC2VgSpP8Q8/QiG lWXQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=vVfdgirOFGYnVngwmEKvD3ZutjnwfjCuLsErvvFAhcU=; b=NToBBD9W7FutH8aeGfY3/2NvFLWZaIWVVhBs62ZiWK9bKMPKJfPQ6oVIXKkzcYGKIT B7DCpT9Pg3p6Fe4a1hNr11K4geU1nKXH7EW7pAeOU+MjxK9YIjbgS7mCE0mKUo20IrRC VmVi0TQL1U4+5io3ykMvJskt8jVSBjOjesHki5YhEynG+H+NOMNTJ3IgY5TceBMfvKUk aSpw6ADSI1l6mE9i7GgKwJXRkJtmdxjynTW6hQWbx0Q4qDP4rlj0UKtc6W8hY7Yb/MXa LcM+vxqshRhSi2sfAD9GlvRTY4xEuuvsHbnLEPHUVGfpZkL6jpsoz4vjR3mltZGHxRF7 evVA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e9-v6si36815265pln.72.2018.05.30.23.54.40; Wed, 30 May 2018 23:54:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754015AbeEaGyJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 31 May 2018 02:54:09 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51316 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753913AbeEaGyI (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2018 02:54:08 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext-too.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05C0AC79; Thu, 31 May 2018 06:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 08:54:05 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Eric Dumazet Cc: David Miller , qing.huang@oracle.com, tariqt@mellanox.com, haakon.bugge@oracle.com, yanjun.zhu@oracle.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] mlx4_core: allocate ICM memory in page size chunks Message-ID: <20180531065405.GH15278@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20180523232246.20445-1-qing.huang@oracle.com> <20180525.102321.858995452200286788.davem@davemloft.net> <7a353b65-6b7f-1aee-1c48-e83c8e02f693@gmail.com> <0e11e0fc-6ccf-aa93-9c4f-b9eae1b90643@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue 29-05-18 23:49:59, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > On 05/29/2018 11:44 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > > > And I will add this simple fix, this really should address your initial concern much better. > > > > @@ -99,6 +100,8 @@ static int mlx4_alloc_icm_pages(struct scatterlist *mem, int order, > > { > > struct page *page; > > > > + if (order) > > + gfp_mask |= __GFP_NORETRY; > > and also gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM JFTR the latter one makes __GFP_NORETRY pointless. Non sleeping allocations are not retrying. > > page = alloc_pages_node(node, gfp_mask, order); > > if (!page) { > > page = alloc_pages(gfp_mask, order); > > -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs