Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp387223imm; Thu, 31 May 2018 02:12:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIXoW+JekPeXN7KLjwWsZzIISUWmYJtZ0Pas/5MqlwX+z8oW3cjGad3tCVv1R3pkXJ2HRlQ X-Received: by 2002:a63:7419:: with SMTP id p25-v6mr5005408pgc.24.1527757956801; Thu, 31 May 2018 02:12:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527757956; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WzwojaTRyoWeCOSKQ0E9/Crex7LmxT9IdCa9HIySx1KstT1V8hvI/ZPOueWEDnOz/y PAA6TGCdULHKk0mHuIoqMdB+SLhELvizLPO+CMtADTX05V2k/a6Dd4oOnGebY2vF0sJs XAEgTte1Om6pYcoY7wyRqUNoTCvlZq9PNErr1wlqln1kMRFtRkbHSLiz+lUGhw7wGEZw bi1GEZXbw+NWAocd+yZlz8NWghQEngKceIMJ/Bqou/udhjct7vWYvr8bMiw5C1UNzLuD mQ3aZtdqY0yM1lj/pDG2sCvebA6ugRYtCUWava8lF1WZUeNP5peiHinPJik/JVo43a2u oolg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=sIpV1jK1ZmTDoxqTd2QVCFiopjjFrcmV/rv3WY0O8Yo=; b=f/Ma57KCjyngTDKoVuBkMuhUJ5YpLmNxhwRd3RCwwa8T+NqikHIaAXzYOngy9bjzfs /chtRwakJLv/76my+x70Kgq0gWL0xV53LN36eSfON3QdLIHiV3cd2GOheKie42vuW8j0 KSU743YyM7pS8uFGS768PQwvpqNfYUFqrPKnomNh4cPyov9QgoZB2KmzFBWGci8o+o5K NtAOf+kAqmIeuovesrskDlkUuBABlipRkpeHv8lq6VEmGlHfLGVTaXwNN0CoZs7+wMBw zoJtItf9/Whx54iSB9/+S5ldSZ77jA0mPwSlq7zBlpqoRyC4EFpFmSI07E5gVRypv917 ACHw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w12-v6si36037200pld.367.2018.05.31.02.12.22; Thu, 31 May 2018 02:12:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754258AbeEaJK2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 31 May 2018 05:10:28 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60601 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754093AbeEaJKZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2018 05:10:25 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext-too.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7852BAC9F; Thu, 31 May 2018 09:10:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 11:10:22 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Eric Dumazet Cc: David Miller , qing.huang@oracle.com, tariqt@mellanox.com, haakon.bugge@oracle.com, yanjun.zhu@oracle.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] mlx4_core: allocate ICM memory in page size chunks Message-ID: <20180531091022.GL15278@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20180523232246.20445-1-qing.huang@oracle.com> <20180525.102321.858995452200286788.davem@davemloft.net> <7a353b65-6b7f-1aee-1c48-e83c8e02f693@gmail.com> <0e11e0fc-6ccf-aa93-9c4f-b9eae1b90643@gmail.com> <20180531065405.GH15278@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180531085532.GK15278@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180531085532.GK15278@dhcp22.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 31-05-18 10:55:32, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 31-05-18 04:35:31, Eric Dumazet wrote: [...] > > I merely copied/pasted from alloc_skb_with_frags() :/ > > I will have a look at it. Thanks! OK, so this is an example of an incremental development ;). __GFP_NORETRY was added by ed98df3361f0 ("net: use __GFP_NORETRY for high order allocations") to prevent from OOM killer. Yet this was not enough because fb05e7a89f50 ("net: don't wait for order-3 page allocation") didn't want an excessive reclaim for non-costly orders so it made it completely NOWAIT while it preserved __GFP_NORETRY in place which is now redundant. Should I send a patch? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs