Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264514AbTIDCom (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2003 22:44:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264512AbTIDCol (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2003 22:44:41 -0400 Received: from miranda.zianet.com ([216.234.192.169]:32530 "HELO miranda.zianet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S264553AbTIDCmH (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2003 22:42:07 -0400 Subject: Re: Scaling noise From: Steven Cole To: William Lee Irwin III Cc: Daniel Phillips , Antonio Vargas , Larry McVoy , CaT , Anton Blanchard , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030904023501.GE4306@holomorphy.com> References: <20030903040327.GA10257@work.bitmover.com> <20030903124716.GE2359@wind.cocodriloo.com> <1062603063.1723.91.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> <200309040350.31949.phillips@arcor.de> <1062641965.3483.78.camel@spc> <20030904023501.GE4306@holomorphy.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1062643242.3483.85.camel@spc> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk Date: 03 Sep 2003 20:40:43 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1230 Lines: 25 On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 20:35, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:19:26PM -0600, Steven Cole wrote: > > I would never call the SMP locking pathetic, but it could be improved. > > Looking at Figure 6 (Star-CD, 1-64 processors on Altix) and Figure 7 > > (Gaussian 1-32 processors on Altix) on page 13 of "Linux Scalability for > > Large NUMA Systems", available for download here: > > http://archive.linuxsymposium.org/ols2003/Proceedings/ > > it appears that for those applications, the curves begin to flatten > > rather alarmingly. This may have little to do with locking overhead. > > Those numbers are 2.4.x Yes, I saw that. It would be interesting to see results for recent 2.6.0-textX kernels. Judging from other recent numbers out of osdl, the results for 2.6 should be quite a bit better. But won't the curves still begin to flatten, but at a higher CPU count? Or has the miracle goodness of RCU pushed those limits to insanely high numbers? Steven - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/