Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 2 Jun 2018 18:49:58 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/32] vfs: Allow cloning of a mount tree with
 open(O_PATH|O_CLONE_MOUNT) [ver #8]
Message-ID: <20180602174957.GX30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <20180602040434.GW30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <20180601063928.GS30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <152720672288.9073.9868393448836301272.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
 <152720691829.9073.10564431140980997005.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
 <20180601062654.GA32397@infradead.org>
 <7067.1527841663@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
 <20180602030913.GU30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <20180602034255.GV30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <21804.1527954321@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <21804.1527954321@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 04:45:21PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> > TBH, I would probably prefer separate mount_setattr(2) for that kind
> > of work, with something like
> > 	int mount_setattr(int dirfd, const char *path, int flags, int attr)
> > *not* opening any files.
> > flags:
> > 	AT_EMPTY_PATH, AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT, AT_RECURSIVE
> 
> I would call these MOUNT_SETATTR_* rather than AT_*.

Why?  AT_EMPTY_PATH/AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT are common with other ...at()
syscalls; AT_RECURSIVE - maybe, but it's still more like AT_...
namespace fodder, IMO.

> > attr:
> > 	MOUNT_SETATTR_DEV		(1<<0)
> > 	MOUNT_SETATTR_NODEV		(1<<0)|(1<<1)
> > 	MOUNT_SETATTR_EXEC		(1<<2)
> > 	MOUNT_SETATTR_NOEXEC		(1<<2)|(1<<3)
> > 	MOUNT_SETATTR_SUID		(1<<4)
> > 	MOUNT_SETATTR_NOSUID		(1<<4)|(1<<5)
> > 	MOUNT_SETATTR_RW		(1<<6)
> > 	MOUNT_SETATTR_RO		(1<<6)|(1<<7)
> > 	MOUNT_SETATTR_RELATIME		(1<<8)
> > 	MOUNT_SETATTR_NOATIME		(1<<8)|(1<<9)
> > 	MOUNT_SETATTR_NODIRATIME	(1<<8)|(2<<9)
> > 	MOUNT_SETATTR_STRICTATIME	(1<<8)|(3<<9)
> > 	MOUNT_SETATTR_PRIVATE		(1<<11)
> > 	MOUNT_SETATTR_SHARED		(1<<11)|(1<<12)
> > 	MOUNT_SETATTR_SLAVE		(1<<11)|(2<<12)
> > 	MOUNT_SETATTR_UNBINDABLE	(1<<11)|(3<<12)
> 
> So, I like this generally, some notes though:
> 
> I wonder if this should be two separate parameters, a mask and the settings?
> I'm not sure that's worth it since some of the mask bits would cover multiple
> settings.

Nah, better put those bits in the same word, as in above.  Here bits 0, 2, 4, 6,
8 and 11 tell which attributes are to be modified, with values to set living
in bits 1, 3, 5, 7, 9--10 and 12--13.  Look at the constants above..

> Also, should NODIRATIME be separate from the other *ATIME flags?  I do also
> like treating some of these settings as enumerations rather than a set of
> bits.

Huh?  That's precisely what I'm doing there: bit 8 is "want to change atime
settings", bits 9 and 10 hold a 4-element enumeration (rel/no/nodir/strict).
Similar for propagation settings (bit 11 indicates that we want to set those,
bits 12 and 13 - 4-element enum)...

> I would make the prototype:
> 
> 	int mount_setattr(int dirfd, const char *path,
> 			  unsigned int flags, unsigned int attr,
> 			  void *reserved5);
> 
> Further, do we want to say you can either change the propagation type *or*
> reconfigure the mountpoint restrictions, but not both at the same time?

Why?  MOUNT_SETATTR_PRIVATE | MOUNT_NOATIME | MOUNT_SUID, i.e. 00101100010000,
i.e. 0xb10 for "turn nosuid off, switch atime polcy to noatime, change propagation
to private, leave everything else as-is"...

And for fsck sake, what's that "void *reserved5" for?

> > With either openat() used as in this series, or explicit
> > 	int open_tree(int dirfd, const char *path, int flags)
> 
> Maybe open_mount(), grab_mount() or pick_mount()?
> 
> I wonder if fsopen()/fspick() should be create_fs()/open_fs()...
> 
> > returning a descriptor, with flags being
> > 	AT_EMPTY_PATH, AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT, AT_RECURSIVE, AT_CLONE
> > with AT_RECURSIVE without AT_CLONE being an error.
> 
> You also need an O_CLOEXEC equivalent.

Point.

> I would make it:
> 
> 	OPEN_TREE_CLOEXEC		0x00000001

Why not O_CLOEXEC, as with epoll_create()/timerfd_create()/etc.?

> 	OPEN_TREE_EMPTY_PATH		0x00000002
> 	OPEN_TREE_FOLLOW_SYMLINK	0x00000004
> 	OPEN_TREE_NO_AUTOMOUNT		0x00000008

Why?  How are those different from normal AT_EMPTY_PATH/AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT?

> 	OPEN_TREE_CLONE			0x00000010
> 	OPEN_TREE_RECURSIVE		0x00000020
> 
> adding the follow-symlinks so that you don't grab a symlink target by
> accident.  (Can you actually mount on top of a symlink?)

You can't - mount(2) uses LOOKUP_FOLLOW for mountpoint (well, user_path(),
actually).

> > Hell, might even add AT_UMOUNT for "open root and detach, to be dissolved on
> > close", incompatible with AT_CLONE.
> 
> Cute.  Guess you could do:
> 
> 	fd = open_mount(..., OPEN_TREE_DETACH);
> 	mount_setattr(fd, "",
> 		      MOUNT_SETATTR_EMPTY_PATH,
> 		      MOUNT_SETATTR_NOSUID, NULL);
> 	move_mount(fd, "", ...);