Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264981AbTIDNBs (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:01:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264977AbTIDNBs (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:01:48 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:59539 "EHLO ozlabs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264989AbTIDM7n (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2003 08:59:43 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16215.14133.352143.660688@nanango.paulus.ozlabs.org> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 22:59:33 +1000 (EST) From: Paul Mackerras To: Russell King Cc: "David S. Miller" , hch@lst.de, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix ppc ioremap prototype In-Reply-To: <20030904104801.A7387@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20030903203231.GA8772@lst.de> <16214.34933.827653.37614@nanango.paulus.ozlabs.org> <20030904071334.GA14426@lst.de> <20030904083007.B2473@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <16215.1054.262782.866063@nanango.paulus.ozlabs.org> <20030904023624.592f1601.davem@redhat.com> <20030904104801.A7387@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1375 Lines: 34 Russell King writes: > Using the high flag bits probably isn't a good idea for two reasons: > > 1. We already use bit 31 to indicate the busy status: > > #define IORESOURCE_BUSY 0x80000000 /* Driver has marked this resource busy */ > > However, it looks like bits 27 to 17 are currently unused. Using some flag bits would work but it seems like a bit of a kludge. Maybe the struct resource needs to have a pointer to the struct device which owns it? Or maybe just a `sysdata' field? > 2. The resource tree won't know about the upper bits or whatever sitting > in flags, and as such identical addresses on two different buses will > clash. > > Resource start,end needs to be some unique quantity no matter which (PCI) > bus you are on. They are non-overlapping for PCI buses in the same domain. Perhaps the sensible thing is to have a separate resource tree for each PCI domain (actually two trees, for I/O and memory space), and have them contain bus addresses rather than physical addresses. I don't know if the generic iomem_resource and ioport_resource are still useful if we do that. Paul. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/