Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sun, 3 Jun 2018 15:49:41 +0300
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     ufo19890607@gmail.com
Cc:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com, rientjes@google.com,
        kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
        penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, guro@fb.com,
        yang.s@alibaba-inc.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        yuzhoujian <yuzhoujian@didichuxing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] Refactor part of the oom report in dump_header
References: <1527940734-35161-1-git-send-email-ufo19890607@gmail.com>
 <1527940734-35161-2-git-send-email-ufo19890607@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1527940734-35161-2-git-send-email-ufo19890607@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Message-Id: <20180603124941.GA29497@rapoport-lnx>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 07:58:52PM +0800, ufo19890607@gmail.com wrote:
> From: yuzhoujian <yuzhoujian@didichuxing.com>
> 
> The dump_header does not print the memcg's name when the system
> oom happened, so users cannot locate the certain container which
> contains the task that has been killed by the oom killer.
> 
> I follow the advices of David Rientjes and Michal Hocko, and refactor
> part of the oom report in a backwards compatible way. After this patch,
> users can get the memcg's path from the oom report and check the certain
> container more quickly.
> 
> Below is the part of the oom report in the dmesg
> ...
> [  142.158316] panic cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0-1
> [  142.158983] CPU: 15 PID: 8682 Comm: panic Not tainted 4.17.0-rc6+ #13
> [  142.159659] Hardware name: Inspur SA5212M4/YZMB-00370-107, BIOS 4.1.10 11/14/2016
> [  142.160342] Call Trace:
> [  142.161037]  dump_stack+0x78/0xb3
> [  142.161734]  dump_header+0x7d/0x334
> [  142.162433]  oom_kill_process+0x228/0x490
> [  142.163126]  ? oom_badness+0x2a/0x130
> [  142.163821]  out_of_memory+0xf0/0x280
> [  142.164532]  __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x711/0xa07
> [  142.165241]  __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x23f/0x260
> [  142.165947]  alloc_pages_vma+0x73/0x180
> [  142.166665]  do_anonymous_page+0xed/0x4e0
> [  142.167388]  __handle_mm_fault+0xbd2/0xe00
> [  142.168114]  handle_mm_fault+0x116/0x250
> [  142.168841]  __do_page_fault+0x233/0x4d0
> [  142.169567]  do_page_fault+0x32/0x130
> [  142.170303]  ? page_fault+0x8/0x30
> [  142.171036]  page_fault+0x1e/0x30
> [  142.171764] RIP: 0033:0x7f403000a860
> [  142.172517] RSP: 002b:00007ffc9f745c28 EFLAGS: 00010206
> [  142.173268] RAX: 00007f3f6fd7d000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f3f7f5cd000
> [  142.174040] RDX: 00007f3fafd7d000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00007f3f6fd7d000
> [  142.174806] RBP: 00007ffc9f745c50 R08: ffffffffffffffff R09: 0000000000000000
> [  142.175623] R10: 0000000000000022 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000400490
> [  142.176542] R13: 00007ffc9f745d30 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> [  142.177709] oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_NONE,nodemask=(null),origin_memcg=(null),kill_memcg=/test/test1/test2,task=panic,pid= 8622,uid=    0
> ...
> 
> Changes since v6:
> - divide the patch v5 into two parts. One part is to add an array of const char and
> put enum oom_constraint into the memcontrol.h; the other is will refactor the output
> in the dump_header.
> - limit the memory usage for the static char array by using NAME_MAX in the mem_cgroup_print_oom_context.
> - eliminate the spurious spaces in the oom's output and fix the spelling of "constrain".
> 
> Changes since v5:
> - add an array of const char for each constraint.
> - replace all of the pr_cont with a single line print of the pr_info.
> - put enum oom_constraint into the memcontrol.c file for printing oom constraint.
> 
> Changes since v4:
> - rename the helper's name to mem_cgroup_print_oom_context.
> - rename the mem_cgroup_print_oom_info to mem_cgroup_print_oom_meminfo.
> - add the constrain info in the dump_header.
> 
> Changes since v3:
> - rename the helper's name to mem_cgroup_print_oom_memcg_name.
> - add the rcu lock held to the helper.
> - remove the print info of memcg's name in mem_cgroup_print_oom_info.
> 
> Changes since v2:
> - add the mem_cgroup_print_memcg_name helper to print the memcg's
>   name which contains the task that will be killed by the oom-killer.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - replace adding mem_cgroup_print_oom_info with printing the memcg's
>   name only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: yuzhoujian <yuzhoujian@didichuxing.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h | 15 ++++++++++---
>  mm/memcontrol.c            | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  mm/oom_kill.c              |  5 +++--
>  3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 57311b6c4d67..1c7d5da1c827 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -478,8 +478,11 @@ void mem_cgroup_handle_over_high(void);
> 
>  unsigned long mem_cgroup_get_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> 
> -void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> -				struct task_struct *p);
> +void mem_cgroup_print_oom_context(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> +		struct task_struct *p, enum oom_constraint constraint,
> +		nodemask_t *nodemask);
> +
> +void mem_cgroup_print_oom_meminfo(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> 
>  static inline void mem_cgroup_oom_enable(void)
>  {
> @@ -873,7 +876,13 @@ static inline unsigned long mem_cgroup_get_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  }
> 
>  static inline void
> -mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct task_struct *p)
> +mem_cgroup_print_oom_context(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct task_struct *p,
> +			enum oom_constraint constraint, nodemask_t *nodemask)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +mem_cgroup_print_oom_meminfo(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  {
>  }
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 2bd3df3d101a..fd1172938c8e 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1118,33 +1118,54 @@ static const char *const memcg1_stat_names[] = {
>  };
> 
>  #define K(x) ((x) << (PAGE_SHIFT-10))
> -/**
> - * mem_cgroup_print_oom_info: Print OOM information relevant to memory controller.
> - * @memcg: The memory cgroup that went over limit
> +/*
> + * mem_cgroup_print_oom_context: Print OOM context information relevant to
> + * memory controller, which includes allocation constraint, nodemask, origin
> + * memcg that has reached its limit, kill memcg that contains the killed
> + * process, killed process's command, pid and uid.

Please keep the brief description of the function actually brief and move
the detailed explanation after the parameters description.

> + * @memcg: The origin memory cgroup that went over limit
>   * @p: Task that is going to be killed
> + * @constraint: The allocation constraint
> + * @nodemask: The allocation nodemask
>   *
>   * NOTE: @memcg and @p's mem_cgroup can be different when hierarchy is
>   * enabled
>   */
> -void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct task_struct *p)
> +void mem_cgroup_print_oom_context(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct task_struct *p,
> +			enum oom_constraint constraint, nodemask_t *nodemask)
>  {
> -	struct mem_cgroup *iter;
> -	unsigned int i;
> +	static char origin_memcg_name[NAME_MAX], kill_memcg_name[NAME_MAX];
> +	struct cgroup *origin_cgrp, *kill_cgrp;
> 
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> -
> -	if (p) {
> -		pr_info("Task in ");
> -		pr_cont_cgroup_path(task_cgroup(p, memory_cgrp_id));
> -		pr_cont(" killed as a result of limit of ");
> -	} else {
> -		pr_info("Memory limit reached of cgroup ");
> +	if (memcg) {
> +		origin_cgrp = memcg->css.cgroup;
> +		cgroup_path(origin_cgrp, origin_memcg_name, NAME_MAX);
>  	}
> -
> -	pr_cont_cgroup_path(memcg->css.cgroup);
> -	pr_cont("\n");
> -
> +	kill_cgrp = task_cgroup(p, memory_cgrp_id);
> +	cgroup_path(kill_cgrp, kill_memcg_name, NAME_MAX);
> +
> +	if (p)
> +		pr_info("oom-kill:constraint=%s,nodemask=%*pbl,origin_memcg=%s,kill_memcg=%s,task=%s,pid=%5d,uid=%5d\n",
> +			oom_constraint_text[constraint], nodemask_pr_args(nodemask),
> +			strlen(origin_memcg_name) ? origin_memcg_name : "(null)",
> +			kill_memcg_name, p->comm, p->pid,
> +			from_kuid(&init_user_ns, task_uid(p)));
> +	else
> +		pr_info("oom-kill:constraint=%s,nodemask=%*pbl,origin_memcg=%s,kill_memcg=%s\n",
> +			oom_constraint_text[constraint], nodemask_pr_args(nodemask),
> +			strlen(origin_memcg_name) ? origin_memcg_name : "(null)", kill_memcg_name);
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mem_cgroup_print_oom_info: Print OOM memory information relevant to memory controller.
> + * @memcg: The memory cgroup that went over limit
> + */
> +void mem_cgroup_print_oom_meminfo(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> +	struct mem_cgroup *iter;
> +	unsigned int i;
> 
>  	pr_info("memory: usage %llukB, limit %llukB, failcnt %lu\n",
>  		K((u64)page_counter_read(&memcg->memory)),
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index c806cd656af6..af0efab8a9e5 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
>   *  for newbie kernel hackers. It features several pointers to major
>   *  kernel subsystems and hints as to where to find out what things do.
>   */
> -
>  #include <linux/oom.h>
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
> @@ -414,6 +413,7 @@ static void dump_tasks(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, const nodemask_t *nodemask)
> 
>  static void dump_header(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p)
>  {
> +	enum oom_constraint constraint = constrained_alloc(oc);

The allocation constraint is detected by the dump_header() callers, why not
just use it here?

>  	pr_warn("%s invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=%#x(%pGg), nodemask=%*pbl, order=%d, oom_score_adj=%hd\n",
>  		current->comm, oc->gfp_mask, &oc->gfp_mask,
>  		nodemask_pr_args(oc->nodemask), oc->order,
> @@ -423,8 +423,9 @@ static void dump_header(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p)
> 
>  	cpuset_print_current_mems_allowed();
>  	dump_stack();
> +	mem_cgroup_print_oom_context(oc->memcg, p, constraint, oc->nodemask);
>  	if (is_memcg_oom(oc))
> -		mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(oc->memcg, p);
> +		mem_cgroup_print_oom_meminfo(oc->memcg);
>  	else {
>  		show_mem(SHOW_MEM_FILTER_NODES, oc->nodemask);
>  		if (is_dump_unreclaim_slabs())
> -- 
> 2.14.1
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.