Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 4 Jun 2018 11:33:32 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To:     Chintan Pandya <cpandya@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, toshi.kani@hpe.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/5] Fix issues with huge mapping in ioremap for ARM64
Message-ID: <20180604103332.GF9482@arm.com>
References: <1527856758-27169-1-git-send-email-cpandya@codeaurora.org>
 <1a648674-da56-6664-bf3c-0cdf825ad1e3@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1a648674-da56-6664-bf3c-0cdf825ad1e3@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Chintan,

On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 11:26:28AM +0530, Chintan Pandya wrote:
> Just curious to know, is there anything that I should be addressing
> in these patches ? For now, I don't see anything from my side that
> requires modification, unless one has some more review comments on
> this.
> 
> Status so far on and around this:
>  - Status of Toshi's series of patches is still not clear to me.
>    However, if this series can get through first, there won't
>    be conflicting scenarios as far as arm64 is concerned.
>  - I've rebased these patches on tip
>  - Also re-tested these patches for long duration tests with
>    1 GB mapping case also exercised enough. Test ended positively.

I'll try to review this version today.

Will