Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1527940734-35161-1-git-send-email-ufo19890607@gmail.com>
 <1527940734-35161-2-git-send-email-ufo19890607@gmail.com> <20180604065238.GE19202@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <CAHCio2iCdBU=xqEGqUrmc-ere-BhiS1AU052L4GfphbDPvOPqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHCio2jufEO7D4AT89URi+QWYJRMXyUo0-PwobcJzm0iLUnEzQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180604095212.GH19202@dhcp22.suse.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20180604095212.GH19202@dhcp22.suse.cz>
From:   =?UTF-8?B?56a56Iif6ZSu?= <ufo19890607@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Jun 2018 20:13:44 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHCio2gQBZDi1oOh8QYbKFbB5E3eSain0soeqE3wAn=zQZeZ5A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] Refactor part of the oom report in dump_header
To:     mhocko@kernel.org
Cc:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, rientjes@google.com,
        kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
        penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, guro@fb.com,
        yang.s@alibaba-inc.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wind Yu <yuzhoujian@didichuxing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Michal
I will add the missing information in the cover-letter.

> That being said, I am ready to ack a patch which adds the memcg of the
> oom victim. I will not ack (nor nack) the patch which turns it into a
> single print because I am not sure the benefit is really worth it. Maybe
> others will though.

OK, I will use the pr_cont_cgroup_name() to print origin and kill
memcg's name. I hope David will not have other opinions :)

Thanks