Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp3532920imm; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 05:18:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKhsyCh5B+u1r4wH8Tr1eVdHal6rlLz7GdI32l8WPZRB6ntiosRkOvFrUYKxNi/g1FYjDsI X-Received: by 2002:a63:6945:: with SMTP id e66-v6mr17211909pgc.306.1528114698965; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 05:18:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1528114698; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=o/YD0bizJDdXIRn71kCnGUEVUIQCg/J/zswt/eTVcU1WepcWGHymaI65CZkfNPkQHc gAHIJ7GS2j/aoYkpW0MsBntnXQfDCPuHnWAaNEJVy5oVDA3U6aXrWWTHOBfvvaxxtNfx MZpI7pIbuAcjNYQLtTXnoymbZBQr1SvZcZLDa9SRnhxF1fHc2/Q3pTbyCWRJFYRau+1M 6rHGJ435sWvaZYqFcShumjZRVQygKG+YIaoYXAExuz7zWo3XzDiO1qsaP+rs6M70F56Z Md8FYRQ6p3ap1CsocpQi+jFJypcObzPGgq3S1ljmATSFXSlT3+X0lFMDz+5OCKYGLAWo Aqjw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=W693Pns8QE2nXWI+GDAS8CXJtMPirUvIPih1YuLojQQ=; b=cVFsB4U3Jkhraw5BKE41WRDhip6iQNLe/1H0EoGcdX4zoixrAU+F3dSTLBrMVwsOUU koBHJOK/Obji4Drzq+5DADizgoUlILN6nlVXfsdZxjspL66NMK/kyF/1CLt/iMPQdrrf n0uRKu4QZ8BmVt/wqsiJ7rov2qjXH5ysxupoL0iax39tbFjBkIjLSMz2bI+JN7QeVgRH aXX9efRxCUuyiuEU4qfwVJ8x10fPxdIzdLwn2feACUpMHKGRBTE0HBQYJMP/TVlCh71T BmZ6lRLq0GILbdUEqOty2JJfO2fvHppbl7mi6ge5MnuT/Qoe4Tqh5P3KKsBU+PMndyjy yhug== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h1-v6si13858432pgs.221.2018.06.04.05.18.04; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 05:18:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752399AbeFDMRg (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 4 Jun 2018 08:17:36 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49966 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751473AbeFDMRe (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jun 2018 08:17:34 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext-too.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDE5AE7C; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 12:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 14:17:29 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: =?utf-8?B?56a56Iif6ZSu?= Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, rientjes@google.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, guro@fb.com, yang.s@alibaba-inc.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wind Yu Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] Refactor part of the oom report in dump_header Message-ID: <20180604121729.GL19202@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1527940734-35161-1-git-send-email-ufo19890607@gmail.com> <1527940734-35161-2-git-send-email-ufo19890607@gmail.com> <20180604065238.GE19202@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180604095212.GH19202@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon 04-06-18 20:13:44, 禹舟键 wrote: > Hi Michal > I will add the missing information in the cover-letter. I do not really think the cover letter needs much improvements. It is the patch description that should be as specific as possible. Cover letter should contain a highlevel description usually. > > That being said, I am ready to ack a patch which adds the memcg of the > > oom victim. I will not ack (nor nack) the patch which turns it into a > > single print because I am not sure the benefit is really worth it. Maybe > > others will though. > > OK, I will use the pr_cont_cgroup_name() to print origin and kill > memcg's name. I hope David will not have other opinions :) As I've said this can be always added on top pressuming there is a good justification. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs