From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
       William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
       Larry McVoy <lm@work.bitmover.com>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
       "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>, Giuliano Pochini <pochini@shiny.it>,
       Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Scaling noise
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 19:05:46 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3
References: <20030903180547.GD5769@work.bitmover.com> <20030904013253.GB4306@holomorphy.com> <7420000.1062642672@[10.10.2.4]>
In-Reply-To: <7420000.1062642672@[10.10.2.4]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200309041905.46756.phillips@arcor.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 847
Lines: 20

On Thursday 04 September 2003 04:31, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> I view UP -> SMP -> NUMA -> SSI on NUMA -> SSI on many PCs -> beowulf
> cluster as a continuum ...

Nicely put.  But the last step, ->beowulf, doesn't fit with the others, 
because all the other steps are successive levels of virtualization that try 
to preserve the appearance of a single system, whereas Beowulf drops the 
pretence and lets applications worry about the boundaries, i.e., it lacks 
essential SSI features.  Also, the hardware changes on each of the first four 
arrows and stays the same on the last one.

Regards,

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/