Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265342AbTIDRfm (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2003 13:35:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265346AbTIDRfm (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2003 13:35:42 -0400 Received: from mail.jlokier.co.uk ([81.29.64.88]:44684 "EHLO mail.jlokier.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265342AbTIDRfi (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2003 13:35:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 18:35:11 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: Rusty Russell Cc: Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH] Alternate futex non-page-pinning and COW fix Message-ID: <20030904173511.GC30394@mail.jlokier.co.uk> References: <20030903073628.GA19920@mail.jlokier.co.uk> <20030904014229.404F12C0CB@lists.samba.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030904014229.404F12C0CB@lists.samba.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 677 Lines: 16 Rusty Russell wrote: > I think this is a bit extreme: this would allow futexes in the > VSYSCALL region, right? I admire your thoroughness, but perhaps this > should wait until someone comes up with a reason to do it? I only put that in because map_user_pages does it. It isn't important. If you look carefully, you see that these patches work exactly like the old implementation in all cases where the old one worked. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/