Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp441401imm; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 21:35:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLbWAxdgObxYGHgF8NMQCRHB7aNHZHt2AEf8cUSkjjI+CLpTfwrINHGV/TdG4wxGQVf7+a6 X-Received: by 2002:a63:ad4a:: with SMTP id y10-v6mr19412142pgo.330.1528173358655; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 21:35:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1528173358; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KNH6eqIjGBdDXxhXYI7Nf+gIfG8p7Ux6tCeJapdcu0NCN+yLTY/2Cgw7YMHjfEWY06 PZS0DLCc51dD5i2rU611+zHVnNXzBSfztXIWBjAw3wpyrkNASb/iHkF2Yyxu1ys6/ZNK 6bJsHT4SA1nj6ZExe2l+p6bGwWZQ8YwChkB3dywL5BRYGZVhoeEO6J/SwqLcfywMrWZS Em/6JsMlRGV5Z1tCd8jRsVwg+zLvFQbuDO1t2HJMiye5eIAiu5ZOuTHofntsV1rVZGUp zWjx+1rdnGJaQfn48RsTLAaG/qVZZztI9w7BUcRKB8ZS7qN/nPOdIqpOQGk8L1YNb4s1 elhA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=eQIEhYUu2pHJr8r6xcuuCtH9xiQxjnIjDTepYYzacwg=; b=LpEL3yMxhlPogDapoyD5LoKyumvWl2vFW0HHSHsz9NHZeEvmWvsyoXK+VklMAuV1bE bku9l3zX4hsBGaiMEz2ygOCwVMwEHGNQIV6ah187Hf7yEJfdWYw11PZXYp7Z09HtfW4/ 9N4TzLl57IC2JxtT3ux/5GIw3CFv59T1o67jaJoEBlBzXfPnr+iDsyUXjn614s3odPtx txeFXX3SI7aJMki856lYyAPNveoGQhVDmwT5EmiK8kJ0c3u9M7EG7jdTI7iNfzSk3Ul2 /W8PGgJ4fVkRwxjZullYRxQuPkuMp/bcP/CznRJbvbYDgn2ue4j2cdmSktNXst5cphT7 PW0Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s23-v6si24082647pfi.105.2018.06.04.21.35.43; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 21:35:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751475AbeFEEfS (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 Jun 2018 00:35:18 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:58119 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750951AbeFEEfR (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2018 00:35:17 -0400 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 09F2368E45; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 06:42:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 06:42:23 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Roland Dreier Cc: Sagi Grimberg , Mike Snitzer , Christoph Hellwig , Johannes Thumshirn , Keith Busch , Hannes Reinecke , Laurence Oberman , Ewan Milne , James Smart , Linux Kernel Mailinglist , Linux NVMe Mailinglist , "Martin K . Petersen" , Martin George , John Meneghini Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Provide more fine grained control over multipathing Message-ID: <20180605044222.GA29384@lst.de> References: <20180525125322.15398-1-jthumshirn@suse.de> <20180525130535.GA24239@lst.de> <20180525135813.GB9591@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 02:58:49PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > We plan to implement all the fancy NVMe standards like ANA, but it > seems that there is still a requirement to let the host side choose > policies about how to use paths (round-robin vs least queue depth for > example). Even in the modern SCSI world with VPD pages and ALUA, > there are still knobs that are needed. Maybe NVMe will be different > and we can find defaults that work in all cases but I have to admit > I'm skeptical... The sensible thing to do in nvme is to use different paths for different queues. That is e.g. in the RDMA case use the HCA closer to a given CPU by default. We might allow to override this for cases where the is a good reason, but what I really don't want is configurability for configurabilities sake.