Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265495AbTIDTB1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2003 15:01:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265500AbTIDTB1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2003 15:01:27 -0400 Received: from email-out2.iomega.com ([147.178.1.83]:49040 "EHLO email.iomega.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265495AbTIDTBZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2003 15:01:25 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] 2.4.22 precedes 0.9.9 in module-init-tools of course From: Pat LaVarre To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1062702349.4977.15.camel@lintel> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-4) Date: 04 Sep 2003 13:05:49 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Sep 2003 19:01:24.0928 (UTC) FILETIME=[EFFC7400:01C37316] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1233 Lines: 35 > From: linux-2.6.0-test4/Documentation/Changes > o module-init-tools 0.9.9 # depmod -V Newbie me, I was slow to imagine that depmod -V could be helpfully reporting two independent series of version numbers, the older prefaced with "depmod version ", the newer prefaced with "module-init-tools ". I wrongly thought that 2.4.22 was 0.9.9 or better, even when I saw the modprobe complaint: QM_MODULES: Function not implemented Therefore I propose the following patch. Pat LaVarre --- linux-2.6.0-test4/Documentation/Changes 2003-08-22 18:00:12.000000000 -0600 +++ linux/Documentation/Changes 2003-09-03 15:18:30.691529216 -0600 @@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ o procps 2.0.9 # ps --version o oprofile 0.5.3 # oprofiled --version +Also upgrade your module-init-tools if your depmod -V gives you a +"depmod version" rather than a "module-init-tools" version. + Kernel compilation ================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/