Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp643439imm; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 01:57:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJ8mUac3L9gxj0X1yJ4wN8hyI8/OJY7iRmo7Is68M0uYOmGGXJbAgqhuAKfjZS6jFpeCNeP X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7244:: with SMTP id c4-v6mr25521305pll.265.1528189035388; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 01:57:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1528189035; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FKQZtuOwYVk3xALHl9HRrj8Mlo+L81MebvrMgMAdQ8Du39FZZzeFjSXqDI8U5moYAe J64+3Q5gQQi2LopEvt9r35TPj17LURWXZ/E/kjFH58TLaJIWbf3Kefz/iuajco64/E1S 9VdSoCudRk4BrD1ZeRGbf/eoKL4st2XYcY2TXDN5khn2hHynFSJFCdiQLGtwchHplpR2 SRqtgglpJuBd1fvkwjbudwJ+q4VdUtGFTfjoMBHNnumTfaeQbK9uG3xFYyu8ghwypGug EOcIdPSv7ZOAj8XATKnhUV9uhiJqDLfVLoVdd+n4IQyBmJYuWw74wNnKc7wtqHRB3APq 0V7w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=LqLQm4OhAsxXNNlK18Ur1PoDaqKoT6cNTWjrKJsTnag=; b=ji645MOyxQikz06U/3U0dNYcTAZFDmpvRMEB3sVuTeXkypA+bDPbrsMyT1vvZleZmG 3I1fW8QyT9Sx0bZPtWkLteoJVNGSp1MKix+z/8OPBUdFJ/Tc+rP+xg/MlanJphzTBbeR CzWY/Weo0gzidp9HQYNq4Tb9K8aFpC5LJN3OrTj2qkHQlgk2Ji0N7FHyIWah67ViE2Ot uYnQATqI8osOHqjp06x6V++2GYSc93SWfq9Iy7bARBKfFwgC2n70o/vAi/54UsXsNOlC /mLvp0x5xxuhUg822ATbOqrYC1QM4SvCVTChKNp+z/WnKYYWTlTYvt+unQO7BOrs8uQQ T67Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r9-v6si25884806pge.1.2018.06.05.01.57.01; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 01:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751908AbeFEIzJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 Jun 2018 04:55:09 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:50756 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751911AbeFEIzH (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2018 04:55:07 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: Nedap ESD1 at mail.skyhub.de Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (blast.alien8.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id MSRbInsBiOB2; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 10:55:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nazgul.tnic (p200300EC2BCEAD003E970EFFFE6BEFE7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2bce:ad00:3e97:eff:fe6b:efe7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 4179E1EC0346; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 10:55:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 10:55:06 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 8/8] x86/microcode/AMD: Don't scan past the CPU equivalence table data Message-ID: <20180605085506.GB27701@nazgul.tnic> References: <04a252b1e06673b8a1f62196093d0573d302fc1b.1526767245.git.mail@maciej.szmigiero.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <04a252b1e06673b8a1f62196093d0573d302fc1b.1526767245.git.mail@maciej.szmigiero.name> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 12:07:22AM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote: > Currently, the code scanning a CPU equivalence table read from a microcode > container file assumes that it actually contains a terminating zero entry, > but if does not then the code will continue the scan past its valid data. > > For the late loader this can be improved by always appending a terminating > zero entry to such table when loading it. > This way we don't need an extra global variable for holding the table size > and we don't have to reject such incomplete tables (for backward > compatibility with the existing code which didn't do so). > > For the early loader, since we can't allocate memory and have to work > in-place, let's pass an explicit size of this table to its scanning > functions so they will know when to stop. I don't like the difference between early and late here. Just pass explicit size to the late loader too. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --