Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 5 Jun 2018 13:41:18 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
        Song Liu <liu.song.a23@gmail.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
        Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/8] x86/apic: Provide apic_ack_irq()
In-Reply-To: <94117bd8-352b-1077-e8ae-8722d7ec213f@cn.fujitsu.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1806051339020.1591@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
References: <20180604162224.471925894@linutronix.de> <94117bd8-352b-1077-e8ae-8722d7ec213f@cn.fujitsu.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 5 Jun 2018, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > +{
> > +	if (unlikely(irqd_is_setaffinity_pending(irqd)))
> 
> Affinity pending is also judged in
> 
> > +		irq_move_irq(irqd);
> 
> If we can remove the if(...) statement here

That requires to fix all call sites in ia64 and that's why I didn't.  But
we can make irq_move_irq() an inline function and have the check in the
inline.

Thanks,

	tglx