Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264830AbTIDT62 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2003 15:58:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264835AbTIDT62 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2003 15:58:28 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:52913 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264830AbTIDT61 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2003 15:58:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:55:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Patrick Mochel X-X-Sender: To: Pavel Machek cc: kernel list Subject: Re: swsusp: revert to 2.6.0-test3 state In-Reply-To: <20030904182606.GB27650@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1142 Lines: 27 > I've said I want the patch reverted. I still want that, because you > changed way too quickly with too little testing. That does not mean > I'm not going to accept your patches in future. (In fact, my plan is > to get -test3 version of swsusp back for -test5, then fix up driver > model/swsusp until we have -test3 functionality back, then start > taking your patches). That's fine. Do what you want at your own pace, with your own code. I don't think you understood my assertion of not working with you, though. I'm not going to wait around for you to merge my patches, or take more abuse from you. I have better things to do, and a stringent time frame in which to do them. I recommend either a) accepting my changes and fixes, and help merge Nigel's 2.4 changes into the base or b) accepting the fork, merging Nigel's changes, and later trying to merge the two source bases. Pat - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/