Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180605131224.GC12193@e108498-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
References: <1527253951-22709-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
 <CAKfTPtB0MHN3=VbS4mYqVH_0fv1WwKq6N1-ogU84mNUAxfCwjw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180605105721.GA12193@e108498-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <CAKfTPtBduambCpfeNHuaqnayUoB8J224LDHcdG9EjH8kpJApnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180605131224.GC12193@e108498-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 5 Jun 2018 15:18:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtCMzZK2QdOqWzFQZTPav1Gk99ujWGbWJYkKKPAMxijmiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] track CPU utilization
To:     Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com>,
        viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 5 June 2018 at 15:12, Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 Jun 2018 at 13:59:56 (+0200), Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> On 5 June 2018 at 12:57, Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Vincent,
>> >
>> > On Tuesday 05 Jun 2018 at 10:36:26 (+0200), Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> >> Hi Quentin,
>> >>
>> >> On 25 May 2018 at 15:12, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> wrote:
>> >> > This patchset initially tracked only the utilization of RT rq. During
>> >> > OSPM summit, it has been discussed the opportunity to extend it in order
>> >> > to get an estimate of the utilization of the CPU.
>> >> >
>> >> > - Patches 1-3 correspond to the content of patchset v4 and add utilization
>> >> >   tracking for rt_rq.
>> >> >
>> >> > When both cfs and rt tasks compete to run on a CPU, we can see some frequency
>> >> > drops with schedutil governor. In such case, the cfs_rq's utilization doesn't
>> >> > reflect anymore the utilization of cfs tasks but only the remaining part that
>> >> > is not used by rt tasks. We should monitor the stolen utilization and take
>> >> > it into account when selecting OPP. This patchset doesn't change the OPP
>> >> > selection policy for RT tasks but only for CFS tasks
>> >> >
>> >> > A rt-app use case which creates an always running cfs thread and a rt threads
>> >> > that wakes up periodically with both threads pinned on same CPU, show lot of
>> >> > frequency switches of the CPU whereas the CPU never goes idles during the
>> >> > test. I can share the json file that I used for the test if someone is
>> >> > interested in.
>> >> >
>> >> > For a 15 seconds long test on a hikey 6220 (octo core cortex A53 platfrom),
>> >> > the cpufreq statistics outputs (stats are reset just before the test) :
>> >> > $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/stats/total_trans
>> >> > without patchset : 1230
>> >> > with patchset : 14
>> >>
>> >> I have attached the rt-app json file that I use for this test
>> >
>> > Thank you very much ! I did a quick test with a much simpler fix to this
>> > RT-steals-time-from-CFS issue using just the existing scale_rt_capacity().
>> > I get the following results on Hikey960:
>> >
>> > Without patch:
>> >    cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/stats/total_trans
>> >    12
>> >    cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy4/stats/total_trans
>> >    640
>> > With patch
>> >    cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/stats/total_trans
>> >    8
>> >    cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy4/stats/total_trans
>> >    12
>> >
>> > Yes the rt_avg stuff is out of sync with the PELT signal, but do you think
>> > this is an actual issue for realistic use-cases ?
>>
>> yes I think that it's worth syncing and consolidating things on the
>> same metric. The result will be saner and more robust as we will have
>> the same behavior
>
> TBH I'm not disagreeing with that, the PELT-everywhere approach feels
> cleaner in a way, but do you have a use-case in mind where this will
> definitely help ?
>
> I mean, yes the rt_avg is a slow response to the RT pressure, but is
> this always a problem ? Ramping down slower might actually help in some
> cases no ?

I would say no because when one will decrease the other one will not
increase at the same pace and we will have some wrong behavior or
decision

>
>>
>> >
>> > What about the diff below (just a quick hack to show the idea) applied
>> > on tip/sched/core ?
>> >
>> > ---8<---
>> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
>> > index a8ba6d1f262a..23a4fb1c2c25 100644
>> > --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
>> > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
>> > @@ -180,9 +180,12 @@ static void sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
>> >         sg_cpu->util_dl  = cpu_util_dl(rq);
>> >  }
>> >
>> > +unsigned long scale_rt_capacity(int cpu);
>> >  static unsigned long sugov_aggregate_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
>> >  {
>> >         struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu);
>> > +       int cpu = sg_cpu->cpu;
>> > +       unsigned long util, dl_bw;
>> >
>> >         if (rq->rt.rt_nr_running)
>> >                 return sg_cpu->max;
>> > @@ -197,7 +200,14 @@ static unsigned long sugov_aggregate_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
>> >          * util_cfs + util_dl as requested freq. However, cpufreq is not yet
>> >          * ready for such an interface. So, we only do the latter for now.
>> >          */
>> > -       return min(sg_cpu->max, (sg_cpu->util_dl + sg_cpu->util_cfs));
>> > +       util = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu) * scale_rt_capacity(cpu);
>> > +       util >>= SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
>> > +       util = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu) - util;
>> > +       util += sg_cpu->util_cfs;
>> > +       dl_bw = (rq->dl.this_bw * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) >> BW_SHIFT;
>> > +
>> > +       /* Make sure to always provide the reserved freq to DL. */
>> > +       return max(util, dl_bw);
>> >  }
>> >
>> >  static void sugov_set_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time, unsigned int flags)
>> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> > index f01f0f395f9a..0e87cbe47c8b 100644
>> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> > @@ -7868,7 +7868,7 @@ static inline int get_sd_load_idx(struct sched_domain *sd,
>> >         return load_idx;
>> >  }
>> >
>> > -static unsigned long scale_rt_capacity(int cpu)
>> > +unsigned long scale_rt_capacity(int cpu)
>> >  {
>> >         struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
>> >         u64 total, used, age_stamp, avg;
>> > --->8---
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > If we replace the cfs thread of rt-app by a sysbench cpu test, we can see
>> >> > performance improvements:
>> >> >
>> >> > - Without patchset :
>> >> > Test execution summary:
>> >> >     total time:                          15.0009s
>> >> >     total number of events:              4903
>> >> >     total time taken by event execution: 14.9972
>> >> >     per-request statistics:
>> >> >          min:                                  1.23ms
>> >> >          avg:                                  3.06ms
>> >> >          max:                                 13.16ms
>> >> >          approx.  95 percentile:              12.73ms
>> >> >
>> >> > Threads fairness:
>> >> >     events (avg/stddev):           4903.0000/0.00
>> >> >     execution time (avg/stddev):   14.9972/0.00
>> >> >
>> >> > - With patchset:
>> >> > Test execution summary:
>> >> >     total time:                          15.0014s
>> >> >     total number of events:              7694
>> >> >     total time taken by event execution: 14.9979
>> >> >     per-request statistics:
>> >> >          min:                                  1.23ms
>> >> >          avg:                                  1.95ms
>> >> >          max:                                 10.49ms
>> >> >          approx.  95 percentile:              10.39ms
>> >> >
>> >> > Threads fairness:
>> >> >     events (avg/stddev):           7694.0000/0.00
>> >> >     execution time (avg/stddev):   14.9979/0.00
>> >> >
>> >> > The performance improvement is 56% for this use case.
>> >> >
>> >> > - Patches 4-5 add utilization tracking for dl_rq in order to solve similar
>> >> >   problem as with rt_rq
>> >> >
>> >> > - Patches 6 uses dl and rt utilization in the scale_rt_capacity() and remove
>> >> >   dl and rt from sched_rt_avg_update
>> >> >
>> >> > - Patches 7-8 add utilization tracking for interrupt and use it select OPP
>> >> >   A test with iperf on hikey 6220 gives:
>> >> >     w/o patchset            w/ patchset
>> >> >     Tx 276 Mbits/sec        304 Mbits/sec +10%
>> >> >     Rx 299 Mbits/sec        328 Mbits/sec +09%
>> >> >
>> >> >     8 iterations of iperf -c server_address -r -t 5
>> >> >     stdev is lower than 1%
>> >> >     Only WFI idle state is enable (shallowest arm idle state)
>> >> >
>> >> > - Patches 9 removes the unused sched_avg_update code
>> >> >
>> >> > - Patch 10 removes the unused sched_time_avg_ms
>> >> >
>> >> > Change since v3:
>> >> > - add support of periodic update of blocked utilization
>> >> > - rebase on lastest tip/sched/core
>> >> >
>> >> > Change since v2:
>> >> > - move pelt code into a dedicated pelt.c file
>> >> > - rebase on load tracking changes
>> >> >
>> >> > Change since v1:
>> >> > - Only a rebase. I have addressed the comments on previous version in
>> >> >   patch 1/2
>> >> >
>> >> > Vincent Guittot (10):
>> >> >   sched/pelt: Move pelt related code in a dedicated file
>> >> >   sched/rt: add rt_rq utilization tracking
>> >> >   cpufreq/schedutil: add rt utilization tracking
>> >> >   sched/dl: add dl_rq utilization tracking
>> >> >   cpufreq/schedutil: get max utilization
>> >> >   sched: remove rt and dl from sched_avg
>> >> >   sched/irq: add irq utilization tracking
>> >> >   cpufreq/schedutil: take into account interrupt
>> >> >   sched: remove rt_avg code
>> >> >   proc/sched: remove unused sched_time_avg_ms
>> >> >
>> >> >  include/linux/sched/sysctl.h     |   1 -
>> >> >  kernel/sched/Makefile            |   2 +-
>> >> >  kernel/sched/core.c              |  38 +---
>> >> >  kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c |  24 ++-
>> >> >  kernel/sched/deadline.c          |   7 +-
>> >> >  kernel/sched/fair.c              | 381 +++----------------------------------
>> >> >  kernel/sched/pelt.c              | 395 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> >  kernel/sched/pelt.h              |  63 +++++++
>> >> >  kernel/sched/rt.c                |  10 +-
>> >> >  kernel/sched/sched.h             |  57 ++++--
>> >> >  kernel/sysctl.c                  |   8 -
>> >> >  11 files changed, 563 insertions(+), 423 deletions(-)
>> >> >  create mode 100644 kernel/sched/pelt.c
>> >> >  create mode 100644 kernel/sched/pelt.h
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > 2.7.4
>> >> >
>> >
>> >