Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 6 Jun 2018 09:40:28 +0800
From:   Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
To:     Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc:     Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
        lkp@01.org
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [xfs]  b027d4c97b:  fio.latency_2ms% +7.1% regression
Message-ID: <20180606014028.GQ16472@yexl-desktop>
References: <20180605071657.GP16472@yexl-desktop>
 <20180605223813.GI10363@dastard>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20180605223813.GI10363@dastard>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 06/06, Dave Chinner wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 03:16:57PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> 
>> Greeting,
>> 
>> FYI, we noticed a +7.1%% regression of fio.latency_2ms% due to commit:
>> 
>> 
>> commit: b027d4c97b9675c2ad75dec94be4e46dceb3ec74 ("xfs: don't retry xfs_buf_find on XBF_TRYLOCK failure")
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git xfs-4.18-merge
>....
>> 8925a3dc4771004b b027d4c97b9675c2ad75dec94b 
>> ---------------- -------------------------- 
>>          %stddev     %change         %stddev
>>              \          |                \  
>>      46.56 ?  3%      +7.1       53.61        fio.latency_2ms%
>>       8.19            +0.2        8.40        fio.latency_100ms%
>>       0.74 ?  3%      -0.1        0.68 ?  6%  fio.latency_250ms%
>>      25.20 ?  6%      -7.3       17.86 ?  6%  fio.latency_4ms%
>>       0.46 ?  9%      +0.2        0.69 ? 13%  fio.latency_750us%
>
>This is not a regression. The number of IOs in the 4ms IO latency
>bin has reduced by 7%, and inumber in the 2ms IO latency bin has
>increased by 7%. IOWs, there's a measurable improvement in IO
>latency as a result of those patches, not a regression.

Thanks for clarification.

Thanks,
Xiaolong

>
>Cheers,
>
>Dave.
>-- 
>Dave Chinner
>david@fromorbit.com