Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp2222217imm; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 07:17:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLTnXs9Pupp2xqQQ39S10GgWvKMdjxcLy3CpIFSzsXU2ZUVpw09G+mwJx1bzDwgigXnffSr X-Received: by 2002:a63:2bc4:: with SMTP id r187-v6mr1750416pgr.231.1528381069333; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 07:17:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1528381069; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eZPxIWLjavWEWZ7Gae3ClFuigustTnIk1Nr+nIAZ5lg5TSdCiOXBzdxXH4P4y8DMau pH0AqKAdxuMKqIvrml1XNhnmYU6uDpPSF1gMX3L+lqXKtbIEz9p6zcL6LbHr0GllR28u LDwWNJwc6JHJdRCAk4u4VTc75Kmyfimwt7VH02gFEj8TTKkd4J2Tt3hqHsp9PO2lEijR oBwBGBcgUOewkQ/pWLUVRfqdmDw5f5l9TuGtdn5rAOVMR2emD9Y6m7n+3Hk1M2mYXniM wpcWDmPePFuINx3eY/RvK3rOePvEVjcUSEMl/4kXOWRkOYFQaHQwf9jGpWWO/cHsYNq2 GccA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:subject:message-id:date:cc:to :from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :arc-authentication-results; bh=HiRHGqvV0EntNBtAoa9jwk8I32wtpIu7CgcCkBGYe30=; b=j8gZ/LmbnEmgDnxsX+7eiedvgxItxCYGDkAgDZ2xRNanospoOK6hPKrVVzP00VmMFd 0/jrCf0kFCKtmdBAyHskR31/EBsX99YmSqdCjXFeOLFy3VEMrdjINM1C7eGYYd89BiiR Ypn8uadpRbu3RwGQ8rg9Jp3xrxjyv7rYEoafIEoDbEKnzx/MoB/ulI+832W2l612PcnK C/1uqVSprG007VgQJ30X48vBa0MVccl9dkpxEoyUmiXsx7z0SdStjMz6qizHZm5s2lUw QdkrzqUS84fl//fays9IduuFiUTRLdLHUrP0jHubgUVepzra+ZakIPR0gRjDTq3946u7 BOqw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n18-v6si19141282pgd.541.2018.06.07.07.17.34; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 07:17:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933333AbeFGOQY (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:16:24 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:39555 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933100AbeFGOJN (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:09:13 -0400 Received: from [148.252.241.226] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQvbD-0005Zn-6k; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:09:11 +0100 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1fQvbA-00039H-6B; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:09:08 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Jarkko Sakkinen" , "Jeremy Boone" , "James Bottomley" , "James Morris" Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:05:21 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.16 295/410] tpm_tis: fix potential buffer overruns caused by bit glitches on the bus In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 148.252.241.226 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jeremy Boone commit 6bb320ca4a4a7b5b3db8c8d7250cc40002046878 upstream. Discrete TPMs are often connected over slow serial buses which, on some platforms, can have glitches causing bit flips. In all the driver _recv() functions, we need to use a u32 to unmarshal the response size, otherwise a bit flip of the 31st bit would cause the expected variable to go negative, which would then try to read a huge amount of data. Also sanity check that the expected amount of data is large enough for the TPM header. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Boone Signed-off-by: James Bottomley Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: James Morris [bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust filename] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c @@ -234,7 +234,8 @@ static int recv_data(struct tpm_chip *ch static int tpm_tis_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) { int size = 0; - int expected, status; + int status; + u32 expected; if (count < TPM_HEADER_SIZE) { size = -EIO; @@ -249,7 +250,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_recv(struct tpm_chip } expected = be32_to_cpu(*(__be32 *) (buf + 2)); - if (expected > count) { + if (expected > count || expected < TPM_HEADER_SIZE) { size = -EIO; goto out; }