Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp2224408imm; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 07:19:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJppkpJUNjJuHn+QSMTlEDJx9iRUyfempA6g2JXnuFlIHm+kC/gKFh4Q62MmL+/+YueLFki X-Received: by 2002:a62:1c43:: with SMTP id c64-v6mr1978247pfc.176.1528381183799; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 07:19:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1528381183; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0weZRzIepucPnhJz1C9X4+W7pbvH1etDSZCK166EJ/eDK1eWwVXCEJNF9R/3zriDVN I0tpOQiy2TVasUKQvYL2D/GsiPMOUq5/rIW5WDep3mJDEGNT+Vg/T5w/UbfqD0Jy+LJy 2E6l/FO+JRTJnm+kBYnl5kAI5scyRTZwBb0EKiQ854C17fzP/09VYP8qRhjwqXU0mrUb AlZBYvt45eOHWbjB6hgY6A7NQcTlLoaRLntege0gVcvc7GqiiXB/dSwLZQ6kj/pDZGo7 JeDk8T8euWrPXjh4X0YXH/APk3oNQm0Ow3odY4GYPDAKGafZvAPAH09D4H2xtx6uHHtQ v6bg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:subject:message-id:date:cc:to :from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :arc-authentication-results; bh=DFefLPS4b4t1AA6GgeBI1gEFJ+C1+jpsKKt+aEAs2hA=; b=ld7fdG0HGbOPOC+Gva5sQCzDUHgWUGRq0Au66hW4W9ptLi7RyhdnX7mND01BptH2Gj U5voLBhhsKmjHlTHUjEAnufT1ibkvQoNmvJdAt4Pj6HlbUXAEbln+o/uIzgQrLcXqjIq OqkhQhvCdaYuaA9FBdPdw+o8ErItlfKtU+mkkxdrwm+SLUmveCP4Hlc4R+0sbD70KC47 j9tTdjMDIiujclVmZUf4MbOo6E2qerbDcuUBrqXp6+pYas23Re7JvFZ5aQehxCxVxfAm kqVKqaco0fmvw3wwwLcrHgm8xGdx9mtjk9B9iGQih4eZ2Uc7uPUJuSceRWwEQLw6u7q3 bUOg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l13-v6si9271933pff.261.2018.06.07.07.19.29; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 07:19:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933321AbeFGORv (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:17:51 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:39549 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933098AbeFGOJN (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:09:13 -0400 Received: from [148.252.241.226] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQvbD-0005Zw-9q; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:09:11 +0100 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1fQvbA-00039R-8u; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:09:08 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "James Morris" , "James Bottomley" , "Jeremy Boone" , "Jarkko Sakkinen" Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:05:21 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.16 297/410] tpm_i2c_infineon: fix potential buffer overruns caused by bit glitches on the bus In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 148.252.241.226 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jeremy Boone commit 9b8cb28d7c62568a5916bdd7ea1c9176d7f8f2ed upstream. Discrete TPMs are often connected over slow serial buses which, on some platforms, can have glitches causing bit flips. In all the driver _recv() functions, we need to use a u32 to unmarshal the response size, otherwise a bit flip of the 31st bit would cause the expected variable to go negative, which would then try to read a huge amount of data. Also sanity check that the expected amount of data is large enough for the TPM header. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Boone Signed-off-by: James Bottomley Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: James Morris Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c @@ -436,7 +436,8 @@ static int recv_data(struct tpm_chip *ch static int tpm_tis_i2c_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) { int size = 0; - int expected, status; + int status; + u32 expected; if (count < TPM_HEADER_SIZE) { size = -EIO; @@ -451,7 +452,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_i2c_recv(struct tpm_c } expected = be32_to_cpu(*(__be32 *)(buf + 2)); - if ((size_t) expected > count) { + if (((size_t) expected > count) || (expected < TPM_HEADER_SIZE)) { size = -EIO; goto out; }