Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp2225394imm; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 07:20:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKK1IwKk7gVoSioeopmyzMc/J3axvyxo7zEiuFdmfeo58Se4B4zRKxdQjrSDVt9dYZTuU7sw X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bd96:: with SMTP id q22-v6mr2310487pls.247.1528381237543; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 07:20:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1528381237; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KKEXlhskWKhvnYO8GPVO8V0f39tlbTmNdtQRUFCBnpHaBd/nKs3fzuZjSveO4Bzh0q QbQ311HRzFw/XPQAZSICNrdAymcUF/LsfxfLZER0BelFD6uXljVSfrABnzvHSSO4j+A4 Hux1fpirPe7rpXsnFC1QQRWjCCnQC9ERql066qjKcXT6G2Kod2TDo+tXw6PeVGywy1co 1aryFFpWvd1duDWnRBRo5hXzonWZAl4HQgDivR8SOkfKi07s5TqMpjHW4KyWsuVL8SGF xF5C/q22nJNWswrd0efVvUJtp6OMEa5kprAfTzqoaGudrIIPhtDjKRBneT8SIQryWtpX mEOg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:subject:message-id:date:cc:to :from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :arc-authentication-results; bh=MuI9ZIWhBWjqHqjQ8kFoLPuX7az2HWwWjYaizxUvoVs=; b=cOpkkhDQoCuHXw57ZyCNpWLCR8epEvtwP5v8ugvBG3uJv5J1TIXtASDqapNMFJ0UAY ngZSxoSRHlh2Qq2L+j5AWHMw0q4lZvRf2g3mT3taITapQnnLCv/lMn94IfGRjDqoaamH 1gQzCjs07REE8zI/1urdHL6R6EETQNNCoiBgcpC9dunhNkzLM981ubLMafvU8VoScN8N sCszLGyAazZk1VnJexvvzkCEhEZBxOsQQSNg3vMJJZxiIi3i2zZtI7aGgxWQffcqkIj/ HHlp5dgDgh7KCo0reLpiyoRxZHJK7u7/P0Lqz2ATrs8nckjztYX43UOzCqRjonOALKb6 q0tw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j61-v6si36155361plb.68.2018.06.07.07.20.23; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 07:20:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932774AbeFGORx (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:17:53 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:39550 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933097AbeFGOJN (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:09:13 -0400 Received: from [148.252.241.226] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQvbD-0005a0-9C; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:09:11 +0100 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1fQvbA-00039M-7Z; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:09:08 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Jarkko Sakkinen" , "Jeremy Boone" , "James Bottomley" , "James Morris" Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:05:21 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.16 296/410] tpm_i2c_nuvoton: fix potential buffer overruns caused by bit glitches on the bus In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 148.252.241.226 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jeremy Boone commit f9d4d9b5a5ef2f017bc344fb65a58a902517173b upstream. Discrete TPMs are often connected over slow serial buses which, on some platforms, can have glitches causing bit flips. In all the driver _recv() functions, we need to use a u32 to unmarshal the response size, otherwise a bit flip of the 31st bit would cause the expected variable to go negative, which would then try to read a huge amount of data. Also sanity check that the expected amount of data is large enough for the TPM header. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Boone Signed-off-by: James Bottomley Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: James Morris Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c @@ -267,7 +267,11 @@ static int i2c_nuvoton_recv(struct tpm_c struct device *dev = chip->dev; struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev); s32 rc; - int expected, status, burst_count, retries, size = 0; + int status; + int burst_count; + int retries; + int size = 0; + u32 expected; if (count < TPM_HEADER_SIZE) { i2c_nuvoton_ready(chip); /* return to idle */ @@ -309,7 +313,7 @@ static int i2c_nuvoton_recv(struct tpm_c * to machine native */ expected = be32_to_cpu(*(__be32 *) (buf + 2)); - if (expected > count) { + if (expected > count || expected < size) { dev_err(dev, "%s() expected > count\n", __func__); size = -EIO; continue;