Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp2260309imm; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 07:52:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLgeB0gp6QTK/2eW8y9ypYwbw5QvGHOZZHqjAfU+Sc73wYvDueZS0JMZ7HGSgQZhVGk3tFc X-Received: by 2002:a65:5084:: with SMTP id r4-v6mr1891555pgp.202.1528383122251; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 07:52:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1528383122; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0+mGI2Z1tfNliaKX63hKjLkXg3sM0JfDds4LxOka6UjtvzodwHl4/Qgf8tmWcNYCBF PoWlrcaQN6pgf2nQtuaCrTc3GI0zsBY3BjuEcZ28PdF692n+RQCfDT3q5jiO5L9C8dlz lMRtNsessmU+pPvo8rtJ5IA/a2vK69kCvwAvFEec8SKNZxtps/AF3n3wCiuRx2EZSZx5 ncgKI2e9e696ouRV7It4ZdJ/c3i3XZUw0GTjTdMI0lmvjN+9QETh2PGmQhNLXfwc0lGJ u9Pbei7ociyNkQ+gwfoxc/NQ3da6a3tag6jC2NSy6eeNUr9zwmywystUP42BXkidhI+/ QYKQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:subject:message-id:date:cc:to :from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :arc-authentication-results; bh=WneiBapDhBTi4dWi6N90IGn/Dbsd7ggdbD2Efxkpjo8=; b=iXroolGVC7+56IYs85xhEXs29DDWhv+TAq0/5gyTpsAHz0kwUfrnSMzGGESzrJQ7jN f+HpZHXlZQqvt1YIdPH7TnGwXB+k3KzpziqkAnA9HqVLvC6XqmXdJnRDW7KA0q3NHwoZ JsRcbxzqrVxOQZYOD0X2o1gdlJ6EbthunVpEm3RYfyftXyKaFHMKLsulCW3sBYN0Uwhb TkuPcLYg8waoVJ3+E220lomMqCwlnX6xeRHHsAsYx37y0l/FE14NIiZTGOksKPJTYZ+o vcfzKi+EdzHGXDsHqZxrT8PYDhFqpR3AQFw6+wwg9Gp4DfioTz4ygR7SABWqM+wI1Ysa GDtg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a38-v6si13793597pla.541.2018.06.07.07.51.47; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 07:52:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935020AbeFGOrq (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:47:46 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:40815 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933094AbeFGOrn (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:47:43 -0400 Received: from [148.252.241.226] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQvbX-0005Zw-Cz; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:09:31 +0100 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1fQvb9-00037i-N4; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:09:07 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Simon Wunderlich" , "Sven Eckelmann" , "Maximilian Wilhelm" , "Matthias Schiffer" Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:05:21 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.16 282/410] batman-adv: fix packet checksum in receive path In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 148.252.241.226 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Matthias Schiffer commit abd6360591d3f8259f41c34e31ac4826dfe621b8 upstream. eth_type_trans() internally calls skb_pull(), which does not adjust the skb checksum; skb_postpull_rcsum() is necessary to avoid log spam of the form "bat0: hw csum failure" when packets with CHECKSUM_COMPLETE are received. Note that in usual setups, packets don't reach batman-adv with CHECKSUM_COMPLETE (I assume NICs bail out of checksumming when they see batadv's ethtype?), which is why the log messages do not occur on every system using batman-adv. I could reproduce this issue by stacking batman-adv on top of a VXLAN interface. Fixes: c6c8fea29769 ("net: Add batman-adv meshing protocol") Tested-by: Maximilian Wilhelm Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann Signed-off-by: Simon Wunderlich Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- net/batman-adv/soft-interface.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) --- a/net/batman-adv/soft-interface.c +++ b/net/batman-adv/soft-interface.c @@ -401,13 +401,7 @@ void batadv_interface_rx(struct net_devi /* skb->dev & skb->pkt_type are set here */ skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, soft_iface); - - /* should not be necessary anymore as we use skb_pull_rcsum() - * TODO: please verify this and remove this TODO - * -- Dec 21st 2009, Simon Wunderlich - */ - - /* skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY; */ + skb_postpull_rcsum(skb, eth_hdr(skb), ETH_HLEN); batadv_inc_counter(bat_priv, BATADV_CNT_RX); batadv_add_counter(bat_priv, BATADV_CNT_RX_BYTES,