Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp2272989imm; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 08:02:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJHV53043x3yyGqv3BPqEuGFqwoAOUNRFM0f2x+eUU3us3nX/KA+yLoZrkV69pYOBBdo83C X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9689:: with SMTP id n9-v6mr2338200plp.363.1528383759066; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:02:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1528383759; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ouiGusNgD+KF9ovJXwzB42r62Bt3UDl+EVq5ymP1ysqbFTRo8ooRCkn1QkYjtrm6dT nFsavcYd3v5V/bwpwQWj6So5E8GTs/Llu0zpgKBEj3MRzc58oDOGncTC4CO5PpgYJk1B fkeGf2D99gIUXnAgXge/ZybXzZAIv1wz9GwHaNtyqK94M6vCQwXCMgX7Jn9Sukr5jJ4A N0FM1kXGXJ5SOHOJjd599JJY0DjvuefsMxQ09/8NLGbWbMpBcUHG7+wcWGv0Ph3TND/w stovIKCRGOAdDOAkb3nePwG+Ni0xu8sw1Jcr9lI+HQwpja/S2MSPbAj6LlnmrlsryAX+ isHA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:subject:message-id:date:cc:to :from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :arc-authentication-results; bh=So9OurlyQcQKHRPI0kjcqgaL7e0ikEG1DzDMe25CPMM=; b=LlGdhdHZmqr9s3aC2cYgOrZ12sCPbnCUWxqhhJ2J6kpjl8NN8V58kEM8GRaWnOCUhU ldRkiAYdNGPed9lOQ5OQyJ8yRwIcQEi9KkC3O/z2vazM/LB216hZBWdUu+9OBPJ/duGy +tHEPRWQU92oUvSt3nRnhBuP+BF5z3zwfHalqS70WkZ9TIzR/bq1Oofyk6Je2l1o8l/x L9D1jyj0rqoa0FOhrBmvhzqzH1/aXG1vZlLrLrP1IM7fIlLG/LVkPL05/oMsklKtckg+ AIcEU3Q/u5aLuoIm+3TllPE/27eyofM91NeTsKFjRDPFRFhSR+MQ0Dd9hsI529AX6fyf d/OQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 5-v6si54796753plx.517.2018.06.07.08.02.24; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:02:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935852AbeFGPBR (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 11:01:17 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:41375 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934578AbeFGPBP (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 11:01:15 -0400 Received: from [148.252.241.226] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQvbp-0005hO-Nj; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:09:49 +0100 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1fQvb2-0002qv-84; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:09:00 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Herbert Xu" , "syzbot" , "Stephan Mueller" Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:05:21 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.16 120/410] crypto: af_alg - whitelist mask and type In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 148.252.241.226 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Stephan Mueller commit bb30b8848c85e18ca7e371d0a869e94b3e383bdf upstream. The user space interface allows specifying the type and mask field used to allocate the cipher. Only a subset of the possible flags are intended for user space. Therefore, white-list the allowed flags. In case the user space caller uses at least one non-allowed flag, EINVAL is returned. Reported-by: syzbot Signed-off-by: Stephan Mueller Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu [bwh: Backported to 3.16: We don't have a CRYPTO_ALG_INTENRAL flag and didn't blacklist it here] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- --- a/crypto/af_alg.c +++ b/crypto/af_alg.c @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(af_alg_release_parent) static int alg_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len) { + const u32 allowed = CRYPTO_ALG_KERN_DRIVER_ONLY; struct sock *sk = sock->sk; struct alg_sock *ask = alg_sk(sk); struct sockaddr_alg *sa = (void *)uaddr; @@ -156,6 +157,10 @@ static int alg_bind(struct socket *sock, void *private; int err; + /* If caller uses non-allowed flag, return error. */ + if ((sa->salg_feat & ~allowed) || (sa->salg_mask & ~allowed)) + return -EINVAL; + if (sock->state == SS_CONNECTED) return -EINVAL;