Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp2284359imm; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 08:10:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJpMJk3wek+kJrRdm/DPtE/xV3uCEvP+U3LOjCda8JiugGNjw9njuUFvU1WHT4I0DHwWPhr X-Received: by 2002:a65:520c:: with SMTP id o12-v6mr1945836pgp.15.1528384252134; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:10:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1528384252; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JLsb7O/NxVwf3dTPfg50283KB+YMjrg7TtKZALY6DHTdJDrFUDiFhhNEFuQINI5OJL eQyfnd0MwVZZ/i2gT4YVPlSNS6+8QW+c+cXoqQq4zJuKiQB+FoZWQZNe3b6AZpymv/D3 M9PKSu35ttA9jaDkodZ/lpO+85QTd/7R3fuWMprCLuBkcMSZHvqpp4fIXG6sQyuITmih W/KgkNs1K58qGiHiplfIZ/ejtLxSqLK//x8IWBO4Lzq7A1JOH3w6J+isBoCxWHW2PqPk gs7dtV3HTDmFoxgwr5FVeIjlx5rxwPUgmW9rvW0YY9iKlBTpPt4bk8j26nkq04Yc7HmJ MnSA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:subject:message-id:date:cc:to :from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :arc-authentication-results; bh=5tlM7BHFLtaFNIVzzPTwqxKo0ouSLq4Gjn4DIx/LL1k=; b=ZWssf7b+sDnBaADWMORpmxwgEtxKYGzRZwVKABAgBpaMSwj2MZeIuRR/HZttgzxVy6 wlcKNWSj9/9gRTCiYytmxTOB3+P+rpLMblKs223Q3Oe5m/XHW+BysDq3AkKsiCptnALv XoYqfxvNoTAmybR8VrSoH2MeeUg8lLDW3L8e+pFMPkEtMcvnxMf1Qd7kCWrrw0tKokHM CRqkiHq1+1TZlKqACx1TtCRA44HYhMfET74wG+r18hCZENDfntSxMnI/JJgcGqjomgkh dOs8syXZbMgHiytOAMOmy3pfUaPmWjWJMpvYP3s/Rd5bm3ha26wBCnmZWWG98jb35Ycu /tyA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d7-v6si4518032pgf.484.2018.06.07.08.10.37; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:10:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935938AbeFGPDl (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 11:03:41 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:41515 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935753AbeFGPDh (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 11:03:37 -0400 Received: from [148.252.241.226] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQvbp-0005hJ-Mt; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:09:49 +0100 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1fQvb2-0002qp-67; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:09:00 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Miquel Raynal" , "Boris Brezillon" Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:05:21 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.16 119/410] mtd: nand: Fix nand_do_read_oob() return value In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 148.252.241.226 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Miquel Raynal commit 87e89ce8d0d14f573c068c61bec2117751fb5103 upstream. Starting from commit 041e4575f034 ("mtd: nand: handle ECC errors in OOB"), nand_do_read_oob() (from the NAND core) did return 0 or a negative error, and the MTD layer expected it. However, the trend for the NAND layer is now to return an error or a positive number of bitflips. Deciding which status to return to the user belongs to the MTD layer. Commit e47f68587b82 ("mtd: check for max_bitflips in mtd_read_oob()") brought this logic to the mtd_read_oob() function while the return value coming from nand_do_read_oob() (called by the ->_read_oob() hook) was left unchanged. Fixes: e47f68587b82 ("mtd: check for max_bitflips in mtd_read_oob()") Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c @@ -1837,6 +1837,7 @@ static int nand_write_oob_syndrome(struc static int nand_do_read_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, struct mtd_oob_ops *ops) { + unsigned int max_bitflips = 0; int page, realpage, chipnr; struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv; struct mtd_ecc_stats stats; @@ -1897,6 +1898,8 @@ static int nand_do_read_oob(struct mtd_i nand_wait_ready(mtd); } + max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, max_bitflips, ret); + readlen -= len; if (!readlen) break; @@ -1922,7 +1925,7 @@ static int nand_do_read_oob(struct mtd_i if (mtd->ecc_stats.failed - stats.failed) return -EBADMSG; - return mtd->ecc_stats.corrected - stats.corrected ? -EUCLEAN : 0; + return max_bitflips; } /**