Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp2320437imm; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 08:44:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJNI3SL5GyG4JdIyPUsCABCbm5ZuaPkCOfm+iT6rZLjA+dLr+hEeiC5IJjA00vSWDDWMPm7 X-Received: by 2002:a65:5844:: with SMTP id s4-v6mr2039367pgr.417.1528386250177; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:44:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1528386250; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ItdQAxEZS3gHgeGiZdD8KfVexSMZiAoFunHTlf59Ymp7s1Xdo2eU8X5Le2PZF6CLaJ IDIE78bzD0+OzwWxAZtG2CUeiH1ZJEzRYlxpsMMbOyBTCe56bPCnhUGnMsBkLbJ8Sp8A hkrEDWrwm3NyQaCIYK+vdvPHDjIRDOY2W749cgrOO/3dbg6Se4HWAvJtfbUDy8PnCOEI Voc94c5np5ciudf3+5Imtk1COJRhHsEVSC7RISOzf1f0sRk23/E9/leF89PtNwgiNPkW pviZrScTddq0a0y0+2vUrhH7q1+fSQfbZmFb6djUQsgE9ZTTmMTN8dprNq+xvSYG49Xy 9kPw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:subject:message-id:date:cc:to :from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :arc-authentication-results; bh=L1JTCHzAgMolowTRWPEp6OGIK4OHSiZnA3q3CHpfgzQ=; b=doYJp25tRg6MgIboUcskVfuHSVKrHFqeZHrf8oDiodlVnMmX6GsuAhEuzzSMhUniyk FnE5TdKNJwXzIqyvk33igQmnOPQE7DWlmXCbf+58C1KetLZeUygsW0wcuuoPvKyHpR4g 8eD7FVFGubB4HUAIC0Wx0BHEXCqM0SY6Jy0B0YBCOsT7jcOoDJxQHHXYPKuWXbQ80hJ0 2gMvy+jfAQXdSHHx7rq0peJYAB74LHMJDjQSo6Lua/mLkHbJc7jXoMckFuehtZAECe86 vSqpopPdYilY3oQ19r4GbEFznkvxyxgs9cOVETEW97YQFInazDLsy99xhpeqM5vYmqSu f+JQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 82-v6si27002043pgh.144.2018.06.07.08.43.55; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:44:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934762AbeFGPlt (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 11:41:49 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:40599 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934608AbeFGOli (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:41:38 -0400 Received: from [148.252.241.226] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQvbz-0005Zn-UZ; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:10:00 +0100 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1fQvay-0002jF-Gh; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:08:56 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Thomas Gleixner" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Ingo Molnar" , "Len Brown" , "Dave Hansen" , "Peter Zijlstra" , "Dave Hansen" Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:05:21 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.16 039/410] x86/cpu: Rename "WESTMERE2" family to "NEHALEM_G" In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 148.252.241.226 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Dave Hansen commit 4b3b234f434d440fcd749b9636131b76e2ce561e upstream. Len Brown noticed something was amiss in our INTEL_FAM6_* definitions. It seems like model 0x1F was a Nehalem part, marketed as "Intel Core i7 and i5 Processors" (according to the SDM). But, although it was a Nehalem 0x1F had some uncore events which were shared with Westmere. Len also mentioned he thought it was called "Havendale", which Wikipedia says was graphics-oriented and canceled: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nehalem_(microarchitecture) So either way, it's probably not imporant what we call it, but call it Nehalem to be accurate, and add a "G" since it seems graphics-related. If it were canceled that would be a good reason why it's so sparsely and inconsistently referred to in the code. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Len Brown Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160629192737.949C41A8@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar [bwh: Backported to 3.16: drop changes in intel_idle.c] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h @@ -18,10 +18,10 @@ #define INTEL_FAM6_CORE2_DUNNINGTON 0x1D #define INTEL_FAM6_NEHALEM 0x1E +#define INTEL_FAM6_NEHALEM_G 0x1F /* Auburndale / Havendale */ #define INTEL_FAM6_NEHALEM_EP 0x1A #define INTEL_FAM6_NEHALEM_EX 0x2E #define INTEL_FAM6_WESTMERE 0x25 -#define INTEL_FAM6_WESTMERE2 0x1F #define INTEL_FAM6_WESTMERE_EP 0x2C #define INTEL_FAM6_WESTMERE_EX 0x2F