Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp2352017imm; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 09:12:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLgOqMsc8K5mMG8QrEXmQ1rdETa0Y4UEeWZco6eW3JEbpdg6+QvM9o0fPHhHtXf4lke0pvM X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:650c:: with SMTP id b12-v6mr2753061plk.31.1528387954717; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 09:12:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1528387954; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RcEUrzbHqSYHuZu4UEJPWTMRiGf6c0vPSmc9hZXFHTnOpwzV8un15xK4BMHSFKbsoW nkvvMg4mgevD+a8kThq0SQKQZSzABB75rh4rlXo5icfP/bKkwgXu1FhuVX0GRw8x6j+s rVmAREjUK5US7o3n+6EKGWYDQT3F8j2QbrBpJJjFBJoyPQuFhk2aMZvJDcqGh5NplIgt LVDjwHBq+TiXnoMTbjXHUD7WWNqEBgUpPz0ZE6SDz9kxr6I7p1f94PSRbXVkcfQPWE0J hvxYWKZtEG1Cg5xygS+UYCnku9ZTYO5PJEZUZ1kxdVfI/iBVCeCcyuD5O66wiFqk6OgH 9Fow== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:subject:message-id:date:cc:to :from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :arc-authentication-results; bh=AelVcioOw+wdMgGFRTC84KtxarztLVemkvNs0+HpAAo=; b=wvWWXjTXO/BNEYg2ac1eAUvD1XnzOcaGC2SNydceaEYZUt70MwsnhrTN/wTmtwabzQ AhnoAAkD8Txz32Vn3eH2lLwV3TuNLxE7MRXGmRlU9jqXgEopVjnTmI9V/RvU2XKRhD0T Le+Yd/Oih9vJEAApC161TCIXvVOQ519tetk7KkUR4G5DsPuJdF5sGuISstqllXDS+cLb RE75mHY2uyzMknSA3exSdv0cJAwO1reSG1zSFw99IYuj56SRC0CT6wvadNPTrHpame40 UBndjNt1/5ItdMW0V7vF0GzR9cKkfj5zfJ1UdL96M1Go+TYomKos6lnNVm6TNCe/zCyg B6Nw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u2-v6si32313781plr.598.2018.06.07.09.12.20; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 09:12:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936023AbeFGQKt (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 12:10:49 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:39173 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932974AbeFGOJB (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:09:01 -0400 Received: from [148.252.241.226] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQvb1-0005Zl-GD; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:08:59 +0100 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1fQvax-0002hY-Lj; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:08:55 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Theodore Ts'o" , "Wen Xu" Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:05:21 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.16 019/410] ext4: add validity checks for bitmap block numbers In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 148.252.241.226 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Theodore Ts'o commit 7dac4a1726a9c64a517d595c40e95e2d0d135f6f upstream. An privileged attacker can cause a crash by mounting a crafted ext4 image which triggers a out-of-bounds read in the function ext4_valid_block_bitmap() in fs/ext4/balloc.c. This issue has been assigned CVE-2018-1093. BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199181 BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560782 Reported-by: Wen Xu Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o [bwh: Backported to 3.16: - In ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait() and ext4_read_inode_bitmap(), return NULL on error - Adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- --- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c @@ -340,20 +340,25 @@ static ext4_fsblk_t ext4_valid_block_bit /* check whether block bitmap block number is set */ blk = ext4_block_bitmap(sb, desc); offset = blk - group_first_block; - if (!ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data)) + if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= sb->s_blocksize || + !ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data)) /* bad block bitmap */ return blk; /* check whether the inode bitmap block number is set */ blk = ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, desc); offset = blk - group_first_block; - if (!ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data)) + if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= sb->s_blocksize || + !ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data)) /* bad block bitmap */ return blk; /* check whether the inode table block number is set */ blk = ext4_inode_table(sb, desc); offset = blk - group_first_block; + if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= sb->s_blocksize || + EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group) >= sb->s_blocksize) + return blk; next_zero_bit = ext4_find_next_zero_bit(bh->b_data, EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group), EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset)); @@ -416,6 +421,7 @@ struct buffer_head * ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group) { struct ext4_group_desc *desc; + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb); struct buffer_head *bh; ext4_fsblk_t bitmap_blk; @@ -423,6 +429,12 @@ ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait(struct sup if (!desc) return NULL; bitmap_blk = ext4_block_bitmap(sb, desc); + if ((bitmap_blk <= le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block)) || + (bitmap_blk >= ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es))) { + ext4_error(sb, "Invalid block bitmap block %llu in " + "block_group %u", bitmap_blk, block_group); + return NULL; + } bh = sb_getblk(sb, bitmap_blk); if (unlikely(!bh)) { ext4_error(sb, "Cannot get buffer for block bitmap - " --- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c @@ -133,6 +133,12 @@ ext4_read_inode_bitmap(struct super_bloc return NULL; bitmap_blk = ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, desc); + if ((bitmap_blk <= le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block)) || + (bitmap_blk >= ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es))) { + ext4_error(sb, "Invalid inode bitmap blk %llu in " + "block_group %u", bitmap_blk, block_group); + return NULL; + } bh = sb_getblk(sb, bitmap_blk); if (unlikely(!bh)) { ext4_error(sb, "Cannot read inode bitmap - "