Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+55aFxhx_tKGm02UySguvbyfB_7oTF31QfgOHCK0YkBvmfV0g@mail.gmail.com>
 <8f46ed9a-85c0-8df4-2d1e-d268cbc9d0e9@mageia.org> <CA+55aFwJAbr8_Xs0ZX9K2iAr8bf=ZgNnKTLopQe6jPCgEBemrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <7a5458da-4222-7480-00ed-a51bed2c1e39@mageia.org> <CA+55aFyD0OMV1eoc9wh_hLcnRhHq2FwJf4EZcORmHPNxTRSX9Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <daf0fbba-6357-1748-d583-bcb5edf067ec@mageia.org> <CA+55aFwiyuA4fKztofM-fdDSc+ZH9aAR1xksL8ZWRDE-pdXruw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK7LNAS=PvYVrLczeJT0utq3UHNL5YtSE_w=RjJYJ3SD9ALrYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+55aFzNCQZHEz9P2a4ZSyWB0RxZcTkh5TVfwTmup-Y-6b8qjw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+55aFwAwoDdZRP6n9xXDPkeCUm35mmGH3fXv=r1HOZq1bpiGw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK7LNAS4Xb_CQ31t_cqt3q0zRFZ-O2n3+qkxXfxZB_jmqvFmWQ@mail.gmail.com> <f1f35cdf-bd03-54bb-7196-c13131f7d0fc@mageia.org>
In-Reply-To: <f1f35cdf-bd03-54bb-7196-c13131f7d0fc@mageia.org>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 7 Jun 2018 12:40:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxe+LooLzpvBLwW9Ehwomp45zdJ3a-P71ipHJzdMmtDkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: building in 32bit chroot on x86_64 host broken
To:     tmb@mageia.org
Cc:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 12:35 PM Thomas Backlund <tmb@mageia.org> wrote:
>
> I can work around it for now (or keep the revert in our kernel builds
> for now) until it gets properly fixed...

So rather than doing the revert, it's probably better if  your
workaround just does

   make ARCH=i386 oldconfig

(or maybe even just a "export ARCH=i386" in the environment)

That should get you to continue to otherwise do the same thing.

And if it turns out that your flow is the *only* one affected by this,
and nobody else complains, maybe we can just say "yeah, slight change
in build rules, easy to work around" and leave it at that.

                Linus