Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265900AbTIERxO (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 13:53:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265905AbTIERxN (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 13:53:13 -0400 Received: from h80ad2651.async.vt.edu ([128.173.38.81]:22658 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265900AbTIERxJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 13:53:09 -0400 Message-Id: <200309051752.h85HqYS0031240@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4+dev To: jimwclark@ntlworld.com Cc: root@chaos.analogic.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Driver Model 2 Proposal - Linux Kernel Performance v Usability In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 04 Sep 2003 22:51:38 BST." <200309042251.38514.jimwclark@ntlworld.com> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <1062637356.846.3471.camel@cube> <200309042114.45234.jimwclark@ntlworld.com> <200309042251.38514.jimwclark@ntlworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1248461644P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 13:52:34 -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1827 Lines: 51 --==_Exmh_-1248461644P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 22:51:38 BST, James Clark said: > FUD. It mostly works, sometimes it doesn't, but in total the number of > working hours of PRODUCTIVE use from it is many orders of magnitude greater. > Multiple the number of Windows users in the world by their working time and > then do the same for Linux! So if 500 million people are productive 60% of the time and hosed 40% of the time, and 5 million people are productive 95% of the time, the 60/40 model is better because 60% of 500M is more than 95% of 5M? What's wrong with this picture? > hence the OS could escape the niche box it currently is in. Please ask Joe > User how he feels about rebuilding his whole OS to add IP6 support to an > existing stable system etc. Ask Joe User how he feels about NOT being able to add IPv6 support to his existing system until his vendor says they'll do it for him, and then look at when Linux had support. http://www.ipv6.org/impl/linux.html http://www.ipv6.org/impl/windows.html And most important, google around for +ipv6 +"craig metz", and look at when *he* did the IPv6 work - and you were free to put the patches on your system as soon as he posted them. Now as you were saying? --==_Exmh_-1248461644P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE/WM1icC3lWbTT17ARAnEoAKDGlWGEVcFDWaWfXutb85DOOrQkUACg9kl0 zbiGJR86TWm7zA5ndg6oyZ0= =c4WZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-1248461644P-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/