Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265665AbTIES7d (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 14:59:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265707AbTIES7d (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 14:59:33 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.133]:55012 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265665AbTIES7E (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 14:59:04 -0400 Subject: LTP nightly regression results for 2.6.0-test4,bk1,bk2,bk3,bk5,bk6,mm1,mm2,mm3-1,mm4,mm5,mm6 From: Paul Larson To: lkml , ltp-results , linstab Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 05 Sep 2003 13:58:12 -0500 Message-Id: <1062788292.1290.242.camel@plars> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 8591 Lines: 143 Lots of test results here, the swapoff test failures are related to a known bug in mkswap under debian unstable so nothing to worry about there. If its too alarming to people to see it there, then I can take it out of the nightly run on this box. These results and previous results are archived at: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/ Thanks, Paul Larson 2.6.0-test4-vs-2.6.0-test4-bk1 http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-vs-2.6.0-test4-bk1/ Test Name 2.6.0-test4 2.6.0-test4-bk1 Regression Improvement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N gettimeofday PASS FAIL Y N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N syslog04 FAIL FAIL N N 2.6.0-test4-bk1-vs-2.6.0-test4-bk2 http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-bk1-vs-2.6.0-test4-bk2/ Test Name 2.6.0-test4-bk1 2.6.0-test4-bk2 Regression Improvement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N gettimeofday FAIL PASS N Y nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N syslog04 FAIL FAIL N N 2.6.0-test4-bk2-vs-2.6.0-test4-bk3 http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-bk2-vs-2.6.0-test4-bk3/ Test Name 2.6.0-test4-bk2 2.6.0-test4-bk3 Regression Improvement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N syslog04 FAIL PASS N Y *The -bk4 kernel is skipped here because there was some kind of hang problem with it. I didn't get a chance to look into it before -bk5 came out and the problem was fixed there anyway. 2.6.0-test4-bk3-vs-2.6.0-test4-bk5 http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-bk3-vs-2.6.0-test4-bk5/ Test Name 2.6.0-test4-bk3 2.6.0-test4-bk5 Regression Improvement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N 2.6.0-test4-bk5-vs-2.6.0-test4-bk6 http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-bk5-vs-2.6.0-test4-bk6/ Test Name 2.6.0-test4-bk5 2.6.0-test4-bk6 Regression Improvement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N 2.6.0-test4-vs-2.6.0-test4-mm1 http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-vs-2.6.0-test4-mm1/ Test Name 2.6.0-test4 2.6.0-test4-mm1 Regression Improvement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N syslog04 FAIL FAIL N N 2.6.0-test4-mm1-vs-2.6.0-test4-mm2 http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-mm1-vs-2.6.0-test4-mm2/ Test Name 2.6.0-test4-mm1 2.6.0-test4-mm2 Regression Improvement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- fcntl15 PASS FAIL Y N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N syslog04 FAIL PASS N Y 2.6.0-test4-mm2-vs-2.6.0-test4-mm3-1 http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-mm2-vs-2.6.0-test4-mm3-1/ Test Name 2.6.0-test4-mm2 2.6.0-test4-mm3-1 Regression Improvement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- fcntl15 FAIL PASS N Y getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N 2.6.0-test4-mm3-1-vs-2.6.0-test4-mm4 http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-mm3-1-vs-2.6.0-test4-mm4/ Test Name 2.6.0-test4-mm3-1 2.6.0-test4-mm4 Regression Improvement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N syslog04 PASS FAIL Y N 2.6.0-test4-mm4-vs-2.6.0-test4-mm5 http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-mm4-vs-2.6.0-test4-mm5/ Test Name 2.6.0-test4-mm4 2.6.0-test4-mm5 Regression Improvement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- fcntl15 PASS FAIL Y N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N syslog04 FAIL PASS N Y *Seems to be some bouncing around on the -mms of fcntl15 failing. I need to do some more investigation here to see if the test is failing randomly on its own, or just with -mm. 2.6.0-test4-mm5-vs-2.6.0-test4-mm6 http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-mm5-vs-2.6.0-test4-mm6/ Test Name 2.6.0-test4-mm5 2.6.0-test4-mm6 Regression Improvement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- fcntl15 FAIL PASS N Y getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N hangup01 PASS FAIL Y N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N ptem01 PASS FAIL Y N pty01 PASS FAIL Y N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N *The hangup01, ptem01, and pty01 regressions here are all related to an error on opening /dev/ptmx. A bug has been filed for this, #1187. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/