Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 8 Jun 2018 07:14:26 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To:     Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 000/410] 3.16.57-rc1 review
Message-ID: <20180608141426.GA5242@roeck-us.net>
References: <lsq.1528380320.647747352@decadent.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <lsq.1528380320.647747352@decadent.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-Authenticated_sender: guenter@roeck-us.net
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: guenter@roeck-us.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: guenter@roeck-us.net
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 03:05:20PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.57 release.
> There are 410 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu Jun 14 18:00:00 UTC 2018.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 138 pass: 136 fail: 2
Failed builds: 
	i386:tools/perf 
	x86_64:tools/perf 
Qemu test results:
	total: 116 pass: 116 fail: 0

tools/perf builds are new, so it is probably not entirely surprising
that they fail.

Deetails are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders/.

Guenter