Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262832AbTIEUCi (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 16:02:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263026AbTIEUCi (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 16:02:38 -0400 Received: from mta03-svc.ntlworld.com ([62.253.162.43]:19622 "EHLO mta03-svc.ntlworld.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263056AbTIEUC3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 16:02:29 -0400 From: James Clark Reply-To: jimwclark@ntlworld.com To: root@chaos.analogic.com Subject: Re: Driver Model 2 Proposal - Linux Kernel Performance v Usability Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 21:01:35 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <1062637356.846.3471.camel@cube> <200309051931.09491.jimwclark@ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309052101.35646.jimwclark@ntlworld.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 5752 Lines: 116 My original thread was called 'Linux Kernel Performance v Usability'. This has nothing to do with Windows. James On Friday 05 Sep 2003 8:59 pm, you wrote: > On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, James Clark wrote: > > Valdis Kletnieks wrote: > > > So if 500 million people are productive 60% of the time and hosed 40% > > > of the time, and 5 million people are productive 95% of the time, the > > > 60/40 model is better because 60% of 500M is more than 95% of 5M? > > > > This is a good example of the kind of rubbish that is sometimes talked > > around here. I've lost count of the number of times I've heard the > > 'Windows is SO unstable argument' it almost seems like a religion. I > > would agree with what you have said if Windows was actually unusable 40% > > of the time. Do you really believe this figure? In reality it is much > > better than that as plainly the majority of the WORLD are using it. I > > love Linux but I also use Windows. Sorry to break your delusion, it ain't > > that bad. > > I sure wish it was rubbish. In my other life I write > music. So, I bought Cakewalk Software so I could record > and edit music I play on my MIDI Grand Piano. Unfortunately > this only worked with Windows. > > I wanted to have the most reliable machine possible so I > installed windows in a machine that I had been running Linux > on for about two years. It was (is) a dual Pentium 400 MHz machine > with a 100 MHz front-side bus. This is a Tyan "Thunder" board. > This is not the latest-and-greatest. Just a good "old" reliable > machine. The machine had two SCSI disks with an Adaptec controller. > > Windows installed fine. It even seemed to work. I recorded and > edited many compositions. I also backed up my files to a SCSI > tape using the Windows backup utility. > > After several months of use, the machine would not boot anymore. > I had to reinstall windows from scratch since the partition was > corrupt and the distribution CD would not fix or install anything > over it. Since I didn't want to lose everything on the disk, I > bought another one, thinking I could always copy my stuff from > the original. Guess again. The original disk was so destroyed > that Linux wouldn't even recognize it. Even as a raw device I was > unable to recover any of my composition data. > > Not to worry. I still have the backups. Guess again, Windows > would not read the backup data. I had just lost several months > of my life and, incidentally, some piano playing by another > pianist who will become famous someday. All lost. All gone. > > I eventually replaced all my compositions, except those played > by the other pianist. This means that I had to practice over > 40 compositions over and over again, then record them again. > This is a lot of "hurt" over many months. > > Then the same thing happened again! The machine would no longer > boot and the file-systems were totally trashed. Also, I had bought > an external Fire-wire drive to which I wrote the backup files. > Again, after completely installing everything again, I was unable > to recover any of my data from the backup files. > > To make an long-story short, the "solution", proposed by Microsoft > was to remove one of the CPUs. They said; "Windows is too powerful. > With that extra CPU, you are over-powering the machine." > > This is not an isolated incident. Every Engineer I have ever worked > with (or even talked to) has similar horror stories. Every Writer > that I know of who has attempted to use Windows to keep their > life-long dreams alive, has similar horror stories. Every Artist > that I know, who used Windows has similar stories. They have all > migrated to Apple. They were not of the "Apple Generation" either. > They all started out using Windows because that's what "everybody" > used. They went to Apple because it doesn't destroy their work. > > Most persons who use Linux have similar horror stories about > Windows. The difference, here, being that they thought that > no widely-used Operating System could be as bad as they found > it to be. Instead, they for the most part, though that their > problems were isolated incidents. Once they started communicating, > it became obvious that practically everybody has problems with > Windows. In the days where VAXen were the "Engineering" computers, > we had 200 Engineers, two computers, and one System Manager. > Now, those 200 Engineers require 30 "Windows Administrators" > for support, just to be able to share project directories. > > They spend their time reinstalling Windows Software. > > Cakewalk recently released an Apple version of "Home Studio". I'm > going to buy and Apple and convert the Windows machine back to > Linux. I wish they had ported their stuff to Linux. I would still > have some hair left. > > So, if you think Windows "works", you just haven't any experience. > In a year or two, maximum, if you are trying to use a Windows > machine for any serious work, you will probably be planning a trip > to Redmond, carrying an axe. > > When you talk about 40% or even 10% failure rate, you are talking > nonsense. A computing machine must never have any failures that > an end-user could detect. It's not quite six-sigma, but to the > end-user it should seem like that. Any real operating system > will not fail as long as the hardware doesn't fail. No version > of Windows qualifies. > > Cheers, > Dick Johnson > Penguin : Linux version 2.4.22 on an i686 machine (794.73 BogoMips). > Note 96.31% of all statistics are fiction. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/