Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp2643389imm; Sat, 9 Jun 2018 21:42:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKK9jfsjO3jTMy///JZhp1dNXuUGKNg6HKsGcedIHNZneE6CLiugXCWBgI10FcI/QxvVdbRS X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:700a:: with SMTP id y10-v6mr13352789plk.249.1528605731829; Sat, 09 Jun 2018 21:42:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1528605731; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wFluGBXJcqJx1tiI2R31dp1hPi16vZTCoenqa//desXL0QI/YL5IXOngBA+9d1r/bg oOgDpb3rRku0Y/qsJ6zyXo99ffBpyESNm3imK+/y21jrGndutujhhCDlO1DJiaDUhrxo SoALQktCzJd8IP7NFpvM+rmhmihGX+gIyapf1+b9abzQZb5K0wRHqhlZUJtvX6/TZZVd +G01/ZoMxNnNqwwruAkJkN/P4Q2VAZoW+YTooto3rzMAMRpyybi3ZC/X2916FsL7oOKe U32ZoL6GK1r+I8ptrTEdoDx2HY6TZxkbdBQoeEun3PqZIbJI1h7hTJC0bJXVLVrLDmsW 20HA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=CcqKtipzhzQNEirNYrn0f68ipFm9sc8yrXlYjgBMweA=; b=dDBdAphfosMPCT3OTC9NdKXaTQ1uixipRkXV5NQ6v0QHfokgwZhgxIMT5J/vONGmKQ VrtMmm2k0duSULmk3EVmwiVh8PmDoOI6g3TNcJKTJ4+63Fe+gkOlm53mwunCueJ9LV6Z f9xQtaOZ84IhIXs7HpyR6GXoovKJUZBaag+P5kQtiPsDmCuR8Scew9RfAyuvTOCpUlpJ fAMimdPKeJwwm3o7Ycn+KYzRFslQlQfxwEVTb6A8L/7NwEJIEHdDr7hrxLs1y7dcAlLV u8VnPXRC5LsIrlI6RzC1JNkpasg/3c5ASRJfuG1pNzoEjnF525JBiOn8V/zwcELKdOtf jc3w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h77-v6si35214787pfa.238.2018.06.09.21.41.57; Sat, 09 Jun 2018 21:42:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753662AbeFJEld (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 10 Jun 2018 00:41:33 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:53596 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751292AbeFJElc (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2018 00:41:32 -0400 Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fRsA7-0002Vu-OX; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 04:41:16 +0000 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 05:41:07 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/39] vfs: optionally don't account file in nr_files Message-ID: <20180610044050.GL30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20180529144339.16538-1-mszeredi@redhat.com> <20180529144339.16538-6-mszeredi@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180529144339.16538-6-mszeredi@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:43:05PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > +++ b/fs/open.c > @@ -732,8 +732,8 @@ static int do_dentry_open(struct file *f, > static const struct file_operations empty_fops = {}; > int error; > > - f->f_mode = OPEN_FMODE(f->f_flags) | FMODE_LSEEK | > - FMODE_PREAD | FMODE_PWRITE; > + f->f_mode = (f->f_mode & FMODE_NOACCOUNT) | OPEN_FMODE(f->f_flags) | > + FMODE_LSEEK | FMODE_PREAD | FMODE_PWRITE; Why bother with this complexity? I mean, why not simply f->f_mode |= OPEN_FMODE(f->f_flags) | FMODE_LSEEK | FMODE_PREAD | FMODE_PWRITE; and be done with that... > @@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ static int do_dentry_open(struct file *f, > f->f_wb_err = filemap_sample_wb_err(f->f_mapping); > > if (unlikely(f->f_flags & O_PATH)) { > - f->f_mode = FMODE_PATH; > + f->f_mode = (f->f_mode & FMODE_NOACCOUNT) | FMODE_PATH; That makes no sense at all. What would ever pass O_PATH opens from "noaccount" call site?