Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263300AbTIEXUA (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 19:20:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263399AbTIEXT7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 19:19:59 -0400 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([193.197.184.2]:41952 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263300AbTIEXT5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 19:19:57 -0400 From: Bernd Eckenfels To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Driver Model 2 Proposal - Linux Kernel Performance v Usability In-Reply-To: <200309052115.h85LFtXh004015@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Newsgroups: ka.lists.linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.5.19-20030610 ("Darts") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.20-xfs (i686)) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 01:19:53 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 785 Lines: 20 In article <200309052115.h85LFtXh004015@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> you wrote: > My point is that your criteria of "total aggregate uptime" doesn't prove anything > between diddly and squat about the actual reliability of the system. Even if this is a not very on-topic discussion, and especially because I do not agree about Windows beeing unstable at all: - how about agregating the downtimes as the cummulative lost time by instability. Greetings Bernd -- eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/ Project Freefire - http://www.freefire.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/