Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] bus: ti-sysc: Add support for software reset
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        <paul@pwsan.com>, <t-kristo@ti.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        <bcousson@baylibre.com>
References: <20180606060826.14671-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com>
 <20180606060826.14671-5-faiz_abbas@ti.com>
 <20180607073530.GH5738@atomide.com>
 <a169ba7f-53f2-cf9a-a9ee-daffd6b53279@ti.com>
 <20180608062158.GI5738@atomide.com>
From:   Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>
Message-ID: <acdfef83-8778-e8f4-e423-ed04a9a8a649@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jun 2018 11:38:44 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180608062158.GI5738@atomide.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Tony,

On Friday 08 June 2018 11:51 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com> [180607 10:24]:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thursday 07 June 2018 01:05 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com> [180606 06:14]:
>>>> +static int sysc_reset(struct sysc *ddata)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	int offset = ddata->offsets[SYSC_SYSCONFIG];
>>>> +	int val = sysc_read(ddata, offset);
>>>> +
>>>> +	val |= (0x1 << ddata->cap->regbits->srst_shift);
>>>> +	sysc_write(ddata, offset, val);
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* Poll on reset status */
>>>> +	if (ddata->cfg.quirks & SYSC_QUIRK_RESET_STATUS) {
>>>> +		offset = ddata->offsets[SYSC_SYSSTATUS];
>>>> +
>>>> +		return readl_poll_timeout(ddata->module_va + offset, val,
>>>> +				(val & ddata->cfg.syss_mask) == 0x0,
>>>> +				100, MAX_MODULE_SOFTRESET_WAIT);
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> I wonder if we should also add SYSS_QUIRK_RESET_STATUS in
>>> addition to SYSC_QUIRK_RESET status to make it easy to
>>> read the right register?
>>
>> I assumed SYSC_QUIRK is the prefix to indicate the ti-sysc driver not
>> the register. Are there layouts in which the reset status bit is in the
>> sysconfig register rather than the sysstatus register?
> 
> Yes we can have reset status bit in either syss or syssconfig register.

You mean sysstatus and sysconfig right?

> We detect that in sysc_init_syss_mask() but we should also set something
> at that point to make it clear which reset to use. But as we don't need
> the quirk flag, it's probably set a function pointer after the detection.
> So how about let's have two functions sysc_reset() and sysc_syss_reset()
> and then we can implement sysc_syss_reset() in a separate patch after
> testing it when we have a non-platform data using example for
> sysc_syss_reset().
> 

Shouldn't the function I add be called sysc_syss_reset()? The reset
status bit is in the sysstatus.

Thanks,
Faiz