Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1528702730-7538-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com>
 <1528702730-7538-2-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> <20180611083857.GL12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
In-Reply-To: <20180611083857.GL12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
From:   Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:03:16 +0800
Message-ID: <CANRm+CwrYRV8NC4eXkjxJeBAyFimGCS0E03sAo8w8Pxod-_A2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/core: Consider afffinity constrain when yield
 to a task
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 at 16:39, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
[.../...]
>
> Then it calls set_next_buddy(&p->se), which will mark @p more likely to
> get picked on its rq (p_rq) _not_ our rq. Note how set_next_buddy() uses
> cfs_rq_of().

I miss it, thanks for the great explanation. I will drop the two patches.

Regards,
Wanpeng Li