Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 12 Jun 2018 09:32:35 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linaro.org>
To:     Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Cc:     Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [RESEND v2] dmaengine: pxa: add a default requestor policy
Message-ID: <20180612040235.GJ2452@vkoul-mobl>
References: <20180530201249.26972-1-robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
 <878t7oruya.fsf@belgarion.home>
 <20180611042125.GD2452@vkoul-mobl>
 <8736xtrtej.fsf@belgarion.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8736xtrtej.fsf@belgarion.home>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 11-06-18, 21:54, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linaro.org> writes:
> 
> > On 09-06-18, 14:43, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> >> Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> writes:
> >> 
> >> > As what former drcmr -1 value meant, add a this as a default to each
> >> > channel, ie. that by default no requestor line is used.
> >> >
> >> > This is specifically used for network drivers smc91x and smc911x, and
> >> > needed for their port to slave maps.
> >> >
> >> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
> >> > ---
> >> > Since v1: changed -1 to U32_MAX
> >> Hi Vinod,
> >> 
> >> Could I have your ack on this so that I add this one to the dma slave map serie
> >> after the merge window is closed please ?
> >
> > Sorry I was thinking it would go thru dmaengine tree, please do
> > indicate if that is not the case. Nevertheless
> >
> > Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> Thanks.
> 
> As this is a dependency to the serie, I'd rather take it, unless you insist, in
> which case I'll rely on the fact that it will hit 4.19 cycle.

It fine if you take, just that it helps to indicate the route to take
for a patch :)

-- 
~Vinod