Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: davinci: Shuffle IRQ resource fetching from
 DT to beginning of probe
To:     Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
CC:     <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
        <t-kristo@ti.com>
References: <1528781273-18098-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com>
 <2368406.Am5sO8QqEf@ws-stein>
From:   Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Message-ID: <ad92df49-fc9e-de25-6fd6-53b357ab17b9@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:21:02 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2368406.Am5sO8QqEf@ws-stein>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On Tuesday 12 June 2018 11:15 AM, Alexander Stein wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 12, 2018, 7:27:52 AM CEST Keerthy wrote:
>> This is needed in case of PROBE_DEFER if IRQ resource is not yet ready.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>> ---
>> [...]
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
>> [...]
>> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>>  	static int ctrl_num, bank_base;
>>  	int gpio, bank, ret = 0;
>> -	unsigned ngpio, nbank;
>> +	unsigned ngpio, nbank, bank_irq;
> 
> bank_irq should be an int, not unsigned, no?

Yes

> 
>>  	struct davinci_gpio_controller *chips;
>>  	struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata;
>>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> @@ -209,6 +209,12 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  	if (IS_ERR(gpio_base))
>>  		return PTR_ERR(gpio_base);
>>  
>> +	bank_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> +	if (bank_irq < 0) {
> 
> This won't work using an unsigned.

Thanks for catching this. I will correct this in v3.

> 
> Best regards,
> Alexander
> 
> 
>