Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262936AbTIFX2M (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2003 19:28:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262947AbTIFX2M (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2003 19:28:12 -0400 Received: from nefty.hu ([195.70.37.175]:50816 "EHLO nefty.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262936AbTIFX2J (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2003 19:28:09 -0400 From: "Zoltan NAGY" To: , Subject: sit tunnel/iptunnel bug? Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 01:28:08 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 901 Lines: 27 hi! i've got some really odd behavior.. if i do: ip tunnel add t12 mode sit remote 195.70.51.141 local 195.70.37.175 ttl 64 then ip link set t12 up i got: RTNETLINK answers: No such device it must be a bug, because i only get this if i have another 12 or more tunnels added before this one.. and just with specific ip address, if i change it or simply use ip tunnel add t12 mode sit remote 195.70.51.141, then it's working.. this problem exists in 2.4.20, and .22; .21 is not tested.. is this a real bug? has anyone experienced it before? thanks, -- Zoltan NAGY, Network Administrator, Nefty Informatics and Providing Ltd., nagyz@nefty.hu, +36702269471 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/