Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 12 Jun 2018 19:14:20 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>,
        Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Subject: Quilt vs gmail (Was: [PATCH 0/3] sched/swait: Convert to full
 exclusive mode)
Message-ID: <20180612171420.GU12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20180612083449.100099222@infradead.org>
 <CA+55aFzLNFO1za9-Lb=jxO_F9NS0jZyti+we=ycr5NTpgzdEbw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzLNFO1za9-Lb=jxO_F9NS0jZyti+we=ycr5NTpgzdEbw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 09:47:34AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> I do note how quilt emails are really hard to read, because that:
> 
>     Content-Disposition: inline
> 
> makes gmail think it's flowed.
> 
> Which works horribly badly for patches, surprise surprise.
> 
> So I really wish quilt wouldn't do that. It does smell like a gmail
> bug, but at the same time, why would you use "Content-Disposition:
> inline" when you don't have an actual multi-part email? So I do blame
> quilt too for sending nonsensical headers.
> 
> (Yes, yes, I see the "It is permissible to use Content-Disposition on
> the main body" in the RFC. But the RFC also makes it clear that it
> actually matters for how things are presented, so saying "ok, I'll do
> flowed" seems equally insane and equally technically RFC-compliant)

Quilt people, anything that can be done about that?