Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp330773imm; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:47:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKyCjXHNza2do/jStpD1y4513AhupESCm5RdIy6RvKIIudLZi1weMG85rJ42l3zrQl2XjN2 X-Received: by 2002:a62:3e9a:: with SMTP id y26-v6mr3797083pfj.98.1528876031904; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:47:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1528876031; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yuYm5+qVzXKeWKzcbNOXOKk7n+k7dKzT4lcTQZ90rf6r9mhFNrRQ9mrsddFf476i+u ZVXu92hoYgE3w3gI3ovkftQL8wQi+pzMYgzYKiQZUorNqDtuKT9PmKrNwS9u6EjlHq3i /kCuBE0R3+/kQpS7SEBazs2rd5iaBPLfDMld5NQBPt9AWY79VoVVQzNShIHPXHjFyqO3 tAtfRuzOFi269e2irEX040qu8q0IQqDTVWigMiBOsDRl0FK/XlpS277GQ41r36PejN/A UnCb5a8Ce+0k/sN/FpVtbfdcSxRiPGcY79mo5fHJ6WQtjNstqsKHCbtzYTEiSEayMtmM kg4A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id :arc-authentication-results; bh=QAN+I3iqmyvGzZw2wZeRS1Zo+EOgTZGalvaJgK/rSpA=; b=Ds9ECZqgSNw9UEWV7fIh3PI6AXTmS93aUXitxCpFUJ7rgQOLdh83EJP8JzLdLskb94 IbPUjrNBWvRi1+AkZHz7Jz+yGMvjfhcrNLiKKR1GX6ibaFfJTx3B41NuDBWCWMMJQCA+ twLhQahdab/W9wlAar/mxGaMWZx4aHsrB4HNxrHTEtFCxA8j3CHo6JGRh50jidFbFLrn vXx6LWYOoJfLeeGQ+JaBVGW9THDkOcU9oViFwo10WXqcNleDE1Ato4D43vQLJ5PBOE+g bxedXGLxVLA34QiHkNuEU/Ep8aR3RndZf2cnQlQkKuHsW+tbhQXLcnvDSX8i/Afb+iPn TmOg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o11-v6si2139065pls.234.2018.06.13.00.46.57; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754542AbeFMHqd (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 13 Jun 2018 03:46:33 -0400 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.184]:55098 "EHLO mailgw02.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754452AbeFMHqa (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2018 03:46:30 -0400 X-UUID: 7e12276a99074c9dade534553a7020e6-20180613 Received: from mtkexhb02.mediatek.inc [(172.21.101.103)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (mhqrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 527931738; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:46:27 +0800 Received: from MTKCAS06.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.30) by mtkmbs01n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:46:23 +0800 Received: from [172.21.84.99] (172.21.84.99) by MTKCAS06.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1210.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:46:23 +0800 Message-ID: <1528875983.11190.29.camel@mtksdccf07> Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/28] drm/mediatek: add connection from RDMA0 to DSI3 From: Stu Hsieh To: CK Hu CC: Philipp Zabel , David Airlie , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Matthias Brugger , , , , , , Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:46:23 +0800 In-Reply-To: <1528868751.15127.10.camel@mtksdaap41> References: <1528687580-549-1-git-send-email-stu.hsieh@mediatek.com> <1528687580-549-14-git-send-email-stu.hsieh@mediatek.com> <1528868751.15127.10.camel@mtksdaap41> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, CK: On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 13:45 +0800, CK Hu wrote: > Hi, Stu: > > Two inline comment. > > On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 11:26 +0800, Stu Hsieh wrote: > > This patch add the connection from RDMA0 to DSI3 > > > > Signed-off-by: Stu Hsieh > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c | 4 ++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c > > index c08aed8dae44..fed1b5704355 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c > > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ > > #define GAMMA_MOUT_EN_RDMA1 0x1 > > #define RDMA0_MOUT_DPI0 0x2 > > #define RDMA0_MOUT_DSI2 0x4 > > +#define RDMA0_MOUT_DSI3 0x5 > > Usually, each bit of a mout register represent a output enable. Is this > value 0x5 is a correct value? In hw CONFIG SPEC show as following: Bit(s) Name Description 2:0 DISP_PATH0_SOUT_SEL_IN 0 : Output to DSI0 1: Ooutput to DSI1 2: Ooutput to DPI 3: Ooutput to DPI1 4: Ooutput to DSI2 5: Ooutput to DSI3 6 : reserved 7: Ooutput to DISP_UFOE So, the value 0x5 is correct value. Regard, Stu > > > #define RDMA1_MOUT_DPI0 0x2 > > #define DPI0_SEL_IN_RDMA1 0x1 > > #define COLOR1_SEL_IN_OVL1 0x1 > > @@ -164,6 +165,9 @@ static unsigned int mtk_ddp_mout_en(enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur, > > } else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA0 && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI2) { > > *addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_DISP_RDMA0_MOUT_EN; > > value = RDMA0_MOUT_DSI2; > > + } else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA0 && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI3) { > > + *addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_DISP_RDMA0_MOUT_EN; > > + value = RDMA0_MOUT_DSI3; > > } else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA1 && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0) { > > *addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_DISP_RDMA1_MOUT_EN; > > value = RDMA1_MOUT_DPI0; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c > > index fe6fdc021fc7..22f4c72fa785 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c > > @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static const struct mtk_ddp_comp_match mtk_ddp_matches[DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX] = { > > [DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0] = { MTK_DSI, 0, NULL }, > > [DDP_COMPONENT_DSI1] = { MTK_DSI, 1, NULL }, > > [DDP_COMPONENT_DSI2] = { MTK_DSI, 2, NULL }, > > - [DDP_COMPONENT_DSI2] = { MTK_DSI, 3, NULL }, > > + [DDP_COMPONENT_DSI3] = { MTK_DSI, 3, NULL }, > > I think this is not related to this patch. OK > > Regards, > CK > > > [DDP_COMPONENT_GAMMA] = { MTK_DISP_GAMMA, 0, &ddp_gamma }, > > [DDP_COMPONENT_OD0] = { MTK_DISP_OD, 0, &ddp_od }, > > [DDP_COMPONENT_OD1] = { MTK_DISP_OD, 1, &ddp_od }, > >