Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263172AbTIGNAm (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Sep 2003 09:00:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263183AbTIGNAm (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Sep 2003 09:00:42 -0400 Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.202.12]:35527 "HELO hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263172AbTIGNAk (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Sep 2003 09:00:40 -0400 Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 15:00:34 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Robert Schwebel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell , Russell King Subject: Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] better i386 CPU selection Message-ID: <20030907130034.GT14436@fs.tum.de> References: <20030907112813.GQ14436@fs.tum.de> <20030907124251.GC5460@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030907124251.GC5460@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1873 Lines: 54 On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 02:42:51PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 01:28:13PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > The patch below tries to implement a better i386 CPU selection. > > Did you look at how rmk does CPU selection in the ARM tree? He has > developed a very sophisticated scheme as there are lots of completely > different cpu implementations, using a few cores. It might be an idea to > make the schemes more uniform than they are now. I didn't look at the ARM Makefile. Thanks for the note, I'll have a look at it before I'll do the revision of this patch. >... > > Changes: > [...] > > - AMD Elan is a different subarch, you can't configure a kernel that > > runs on both the AMD Elan and other i386 CPUs > > Ack. Same with for example Geode. And the subarchs might have different It seems the Geode support isn't fully merged in 2.6? > implementations, like Elan SC400, Elan SC410, Elan SC520. It should be no problem to add a "Processor support" menu for the Elan that allows you to specify which Elan CPUs you plan to support. > > - @Robert: > > there were no Elan CFLAGS in arch/i386/Makefile??? > > That seems to have evolved since I last touched the Elan stuff. The > Elans are more or less 486 cores with some edges, so adding -march=i486 > should be ok. >... Thanks, I'll do this. > Robert Thanks for your comments Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/