Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VdSW1po7fVv+A6ATTU7CkN-4nQ1haQSCq7b_+ZR9tNXCQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABe79T6zQ_7Ycws5b=xaQ3edpVn1QPQyWd9p24eqLGpYbdtt0A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHp75VdSW1po7fVv+A6ATTU7CkN-4nQ1haQSCq7b_+ZR9tNXCQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@broadcom.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:28:12 +0530
Message-ID: <CABe79T5i8zUcBJnFmM-pAvzXf2CZXesh4NqxSGFj8f0Z-c8m1g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ACPI support in common clock framework
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Thank you Andy,

Regards,
Srinath.

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> +Cc: Rafael, ACPI ML
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 7:14 AM, Srinath Mannam
> <srinath.mannam@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> Hi Michael, Stephen,
>>
>> We are adding ACPI support in our Linux based platform.
>> At present our clock hierarchy using common clock framework through DTS.
>> Now we required ACPI support in common clock framework to upgrade our platform.
>>
>> For example, clk_get API called in many drivers to get clock device is
>> tightly coupled with DT framework.
>>
>> Please let us know, if anybody in Open Source community have plans to
>> add ACPI support for common clock framework.
>> If not please suggest us alternative method to use common clock
>> framework in ACPI use case.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Srinath.
>
>
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko