Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 12:31:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 12:31:13 -0500 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:9076 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 12:30:50 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 18:30:37 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Alan Cox Cc: Michael Boman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations... Message-ID: <20001103183037.K857@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <3A02D150.E7E87398@usa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 03:38:56PM +0000 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 03:38:56PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > [..] while thats very > sensible [..] Not that it matters much but jfs means "journalling filesystem" and fs/jfs isn't a filesystem in the ext3 patch, so it doesn't look that sensible to me. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/