Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
To:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 02/27] docs: crypto_engine.rst: Fix two parse warnings
Date:   Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:08:47 -0300
Message-Id: <0e11caf5c0ebe261c7e6c134a5a6be83bcfaf8b8.1528990947.git.mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1528990947.git.mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
References: <cover.1528990947.git.mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1528990947.git.mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
References: <cover.1528990947.git.mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

./Documentation/crypto/crypto_engine.rst:13: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
./Documentation/crypto/crypto_engine.rst:15: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
---
 Documentation/crypto/crypto_engine.rst | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/crypto/crypto_engine.rst b/Documentation/crypto/crypto_engine.rst
index 8272ac92a14f..1d56221dfe35 100644
--- a/Documentation/crypto/crypto_engine.rst
+++ b/Documentation/crypto/crypto_engine.rst
@@ -8,11 +8,13 @@ The crypto engine API (CE), is a crypto queue manager.
 
 Requirement
 -----------
-You have to put at start of your tfm_ctx the struct crypto_engine_ctx
-struct your_tfm_ctx {
+You have to put at start of your tfm_ctx the struct crypto_engine_ctx::
+
+  struct your_tfm_ctx {
         struct crypto_engine_ctx enginectx;
         ...
-};
+  };
+
 Why: Since CE manage only crypto_async_request, it cannot know the underlying
 request_type and so have access only on the TFM.
 So using container_of for accessing __ctx is impossible.
-- 
2.17.1