Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 14 Jun 2018 19:37:31 -0700
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        target-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
        qla2xxx-upstream@qlogic.com,
        Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use sbitmap instead of percpu_ida
Message-ID: <20180615023731.GA5706@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <20180612190545.10781-1-willy@infradead.org>
 <yq136xols59.fsf@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <yq136xols59.fsf@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:06:58PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Matthew,
> 
> > Removing the percpu_ida code nets over 400 lines of removal.  It's not
> > as spectacular as deleting an entire architecture, but it's still a
> > worthy reduction in lines of code.
> 
> Since most of the changes are in scsi or target, should I take this
> series through my tree?

I'd welcome that.  Nick seems to be inactive as target maintainer;
his tree on kernel.org hasn't seen any updates in five months.

Thanks!