Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp523511imm; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 01:42:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKILMXgrNoydJPg1SJ7pwmcyVCPnmI1S+PjCEV2r5eDTNX0VHlbFHayCKx6Km53jXymhj7K2 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7105:: with SMTP id a5-v6mr925137pll.171.1529052151555; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 01:42:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1529052151; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XY7lZfh57meOg/X/QSYJDZ/Aj1NlhtdqvFF8Ymew0lVIPim9wINP1b70jJUTQU4y/K et9eFJN4ZZBhK9/2em4QZd9D/anABCFjP0C5iEDyXZrYUFpm9x0vLuEpEBlcgOpgQath oTo1HKANvR3cAeAlGb35qFLGq2Hh7kWkJLIKnvBodPNXY+csmyllSwXpuRn//JvxECYM bUPj5Io8D4Jsc9uUzPmlXO5pwAVPM0Cl70cfHh3hL0L/nJjCzi+VdlkxHvEEdvEJWRdy mOoM64nH9PBud0BPvqjOVb0Qr1ofWntj61LBt3EFy8Tiuy9aXZPbyXzV24byZwkfFc49 mPCw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=5ex0q09CZWXV0+gNQbh3bDHqQEo6frIfhSqAPqKP9Gs=; b=iJ36gGL32JSXs4ktA/hIuLIMa4Lys5t/0XB4ByNcmg9oKNkuScHlexCx0P2K8tLTnR LN3KZqvMBeYe7gaTAP2Gfkcv0pVgB27/lXCQZtnvSicBPES53yeGoa98CCNgitbdrFsK tGmOTiZ9Cl2m8g9oD1tmZM1UiKC1FNNZvY/8Q5Ms3iPg4PqTyTx+mjNBezK6TR11u40e UR28xzdYC7+pv4M9ZH1/QBEvAc6/2vdMXeQIzA0KfKw5dWlzhKhDEBAborzyHb8Tby0U RiAhPbiKv5zIDK58P7FhZW0ZQS64ihnxt7D/YsS94zlqjqG89u91gIAtWybcj5Ue6/0F jGQg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x6-v6si6181191pgo.448.2018.06.15.01.42.16; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 01:42:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936198AbeFOIlp (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 15 Jun 2018 04:41:45 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41054 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932452AbeFOIlo (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2018 04:41:44 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext-too.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B590BAB3E; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 08:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:41:42 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Naoya Horiguchi Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Oscar Salvador , Oscar Salvador , Pavel Tatashin , Steven Sistare , Daniel Jordan , Matthew Wilcox , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , "mingo@kernel.org" , "dan.j.williams@intel.com" , Huang Ying Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE_RAM regions into memblock.reserved Message-ID: <20180615084142.GE24039@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20180607094921.GA8545@techadventures.net> <20180607100256.GA9129@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> <20180613054107.GA5329@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> <20180613090700.GG13364@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180614051618.GB17860@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> <20180614053859.GA9863@techadventures.net> <20180614063454.GA32419@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> <20180614213033.GA19374@techadventures.net> <20180615010927.GC1196@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> <20180615072947.GB23273@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180615072947.GB23273@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri 15-06-18 07:29:48, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: [...] > From: Naoya Horiguchi > Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:04:36 +0900 > Subject: [PATCH] x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE_RAM regions into memblock.reserved > > There is a kernel panic that is triggered when reading /proc/kpageflags > on the kernel booted with kernel parameter 'memmap=nn[KMG]!ss[KMG]': > > BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffffffffffffe > PGD 9b20e067 P4D 9b20e067 PUD 9b210067 PMD 0 > Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI > CPU: 2 PID: 1728 Comm: page-types Not tainted 4.17.0-rc6-mm1-v4.17-rc6-180605-0816-00236-g2dfb086ef02c+ #160 > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.fc28 04/01/2014 > RIP: 0010:stable_page_flags+0x27/0x3c0 > Code: 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 85 ff 0f 84 a0 03 00 00 41 54 55 49 89 fc 53 48 8b 57 08 48 8b 2f 48 8d 42 ff 83 e2 01 48 0f 44 c7 <48> 8b 00 f6 c4 01 0f 84 10 03 00 00 31 db 49 8b 54 24 08 4c 89 e7 > RSP: 0018:ffffbbd44111fde0 EFLAGS: 00010202 > RAX: fffffffffffffffe RBX: 00007fffffffeff9 RCX: 0000000000000000 > RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000202 RDI: ffffed1182fff5c0 > RBP: ffffffffffffffff R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001 > R10: ffffbbd44111fed8 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffed1182fff5c0 > R13: 00000000000bffd7 R14: 0000000002fff5c0 R15: ffffbbd44111ff10 > FS: 00007efc4335a500(0000) GS:ffff93a5bfc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > CR2: fffffffffffffffe CR3: 00000000b2a58000 CR4: 00000000001406e0 > Call Trace: > kpageflags_read+0xc7/0x120 > proc_reg_read+0x3c/0x60 > __vfs_read+0x36/0x170 > vfs_read+0x89/0x130 > ksys_pread64+0x71/0x90 > do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x160 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 > RIP: 0033:0x7efc42e75e23 > Code: 09 00 ba 9f 01 00 00 e8 ab 81 f4 ff 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 83 3d 29 0a 2d 00 00 75 13 49 89 ca b8 11 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 34 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 db d3 01 00 48 89 04 24 > > According to kernel bisection, this problem became visible due to commit > f7f99100d8d9 which changes how struct pages are initialized. > > Memblock layout affects the pfn ranges covered by node/zone. Consider > that we have a VM with 2 NUMA nodes and each node has 4GB memory, and > the default (no memmap= given) memblock layout is like below: > > MEMBLOCK configuration: > memory size = 0x00000001fff75c00 reserved size = 0x000000000300c000 > memory.cnt = 0x4 > memory[0x0] [0x0000000000001000-0x000000000009efff], 0x000000000009e000 bytes on node 0 flags: 0x0 > memory[0x1] [0x0000000000100000-0x00000000bffd6fff], 0x00000000bfed7000 bytes on node 0 flags: 0x0 > memory[0x2] [0x0000000100000000-0x000000013fffffff], 0x0000000040000000 bytes on node 0 flags: 0x0 > memory[0x3] [0x0000000140000000-0x000000023fffffff], 0x0000000100000000 bytes on node 1 flags: 0x0 > ... > > If you give memmap=1G!4G (so it just covers memory[0x2]), > the range [0x100000000-0x13fffffff] is gone: > > MEMBLOCK configuration: > memory size = 0x00000001bff75c00 reserved size = 0x000000000300c000 > memory.cnt = 0x3 > memory[0x0] [0x0000000000001000-0x000000000009efff], 0x000000000009e000 bytes on node 0 flags: 0x0 > memory[0x1] [0x0000000000100000-0x00000000bffd6fff], 0x00000000bfed7000 bytes on node 0 flags: 0x0 > memory[0x2] [0x0000000140000000-0x000000023fffffff], 0x0000000100000000 bytes on node 1 flags: 0x0 > ... > > This causes shrinking node 0's pfn range because it is calculated by > the address range of memblock.memory. So some of struct pages in the > gap range are left uninitialized. > > We have a function zero_resv_unavail() which does zeroing the struct > pages within the reserved unavailable range (i.e. memblock.memory && > !memblock.reserved). This patch utilizes it to cover all unavailable > ranges by putting them into memblock.reserved. > > Fixes: f7f99100d8d9 ("mm: stop zeroing memory during allocation in vmemmap") > Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi > Tested-by: Oscar Salvador OK, this makes sense to me. It is definitely much better than the original attempt. Unless I am missing something this should be correct Acked-by: Michal Hocko > --- > arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c > index d1f25c831447..c88c23c658c1 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c > @@ -1248,6 +1248,7 @@ void __init e820__memblock_setup(void) > { > int i; > u64 end; > + u64 addr = 0; > > /* > * The bootstrap memblock region count maximum is 128 entries > @@ -1264,13 +1265,21 @@ void __init e820__memblock_setup(void) > struct e820_entry *entry = &e820_table->entries[i]; > > end = entry->addr + entry->size; > + if (addr < entry->addr) > + memblock_reserve(addr, entry->addr - addr); > + addr = end; > if (end != (resource_size_t)end) > continue; > > + /* > + * all !E820_TYPE_RAM ranges (including gap ranges) are put > + * into memblock.reserved to make sure that struct pages in > + * such regions are not left uninitialized after bootup. > + */ > if (entry->type != E820_TYPE_RAM && entry->type != E820_TYPE_RESERVED_KERN) > - continue; > - > - memblock_add(entry->addr, entry->size); > + memblock_reserve(entry->addr, entry->size); > + else > + memblock_add(entry->addr, entry->size); > } > > /* Throw away partial pages: */ > -- > 2.7.4 -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs