Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1529057003-2212-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
 <1529057003-2212-2-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> <20180615113608.6m74sm7gpl5p6oqe@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180615113608.6m74sm7gpl5p6oqe@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Sat, 16 Jun 2018 10:27:27 +0900
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwRC6gszsHsGcOonV5SHDb7SxWKWbMQsTZ7KD85G_SnLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] perf/core: Use sysctl to turn on/off dropping
 leaked kernel samples
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc:     yao.jin@linux.intel.com,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>, yao.jin@intel.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 8:36 PM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>
> At least for sampling the GPRs, we could do something like below
> unconditionally, which seems sufficient for my test cases.

Ack.

The PEBS case may need checking, but maybe PEBS doesn't even have this issue?

                 Linus